Services may be virtual [delivered to the desktop] or they may be
physical [delivered within a particular place]. At the moment, STM
libraries or information centers are in a rapid transition from being
seen as a place where services are provided to those who enter the
doors to virtual space that provides
services 24/7 no matter where you are. Some services may be better
provided within a designated
environment IF that environment is convenient, comfortable, and open
when needed.
Which library services will be most effective if housed in a
traditional library building? Which services, if any, require a
physical library to be effective?
Traditionally, library services have been housed with the
collections needed to support them. One advantage/disadvantage of
traditional STM collections was that most of the materials in the
stacks were periodicals or annuals and these could be placed in storage
collections fairly quickly since STM content often dates quickly. With
the replacement of print backfiles by digital ones, the space
requirements for access to content has been dramatically reduced. This
means that services need not be housed next to collections. Thus, the
STM services might well be moved into a relatively small space in the
same building where the STM students and faculty or the STM researchers
and staff are housed. Although a bit of a challenge, this would allow
for a much more effective integration of research, instruction, and
information provision.
While libraries have long provided user space, it was typically in
large and often somewhat uncomfortable rooms. The recent trend
emphasizes smaller, more comfortable rooms suitable for group work.
Many of these rooms include the needed hardware and software to
prepare and view group presentations. Reservable rooms as well as
designated quiet areas are an essential part of the contemporary STM
library space. Increasingly, some librarians see the library as a place
where information users share and meet with others to solve common
problems. Thus, it is important to provide food and drink as well as
exhibits, events, and group space.
If you were designing a 21st Century STM library or information
center, how much space would you need and for what? Would it make sense
to move the service operations to the site where the users are most
likely to be found?
Another way of considering space is to begin with the
space of actual and potential users. Where do the live? Where do they
spend their time? How close are they to the physical library? What
incentives would encourage them to come to the library?
A traditional model for the STM library is the departmental
library.
Thus, there would be a separate library for each STM department. For
example, the geology library would be located in the geology building.
The library would be relatively small, really a
working collection, with no more than one or two librarians. Students
and faculty could easily drop in between classes. In fact, faculty
offices would probably be just down the hall. The advantage is that the
librarians become an integral part of the geology community and the
users see the library as an essential component of their
educational/research experience. The major disadvantage is that each
discipline specific collection is isolated from others, a terrible
barrier when more and more disciplines have become inter-disciplinary.
There is also a substantial cost in duplication of content that will be
needed by more than one discipline. Typically, small departmental
libraries are open fewer hours and have fewer services than would be
found in a central library. A serious problem is that there is never
enough space as academic departments grow so some departmental
libraries have been evicted from their space to make way for offices or
class rooms. Nevertheless, this is the most popular model [at least pre
library 2.0].
The discipline cluster model is one step up from the departmental
model. Here related disciplines are housed together. Michigan
State has a biomedical and physical sciences library that includes:
The integrated model eliminates departmental libraries entirely so
that all collections and services are housed in one large facility.
This is the most economical model and seems better suited to a world of
multi-disciplinary and mission-oriented research where scientific and
social science research content are both needed for problem-solving
research.
Although yet to be realized, the virtual STM library or information
center could be housed anywhere and need be visited only by those who
maintain the servers and other IT services. Since collections and
services are provided digitally, even those who provide intervention,
assistance, and instruction could be in a variety of locations [even at
home]. This model with its low space requirement could allow for the
rebirth of departmental services with the STM library housed in an
office in the departmental or research space.
Which sort of STM library makes sense to you?
Half-life is used "to measure the rate of
radioactive decay of
disintegration. The time lapse during which a radioactive mass loses
one half of its radioactivity." When applied to the scientific
literature, half-life is how long it takes for the literature to lose
one half of its use. For some scientific literatures, the half-life is
as short as five or six years. This means that STM collections
become obsolete rather quickly. It also means that if collections are
limited to items likely to be used and useful, the collections may be
weeded regularly so that there will be a fairly small current
collection and a much larger retrospective collection. Of course, with
digital full-text databases, shelf space is no longer a concern. Other
problems too are eliminated such as mutilation, theft, and the need for
duplicate copies. In science, information cumulates quickly so that
there is relatively little need for older content.
Because STM content, especially the periodicals, are notably
expensive, they represent a substantial expense. In many academic
libraries, the cost of STM serial content has substantially
reduced the funding available for book purchases so important to
disciplines in the humanities and some of the social sciences. The
heart of the local STM collection has been the periodical collection
and then the reference collection of expensive handbooks and other
series. Because of the cost, few users would purchase their own copy of
needed content. While the shape of the collection remains the same, the
full-text databases have replaced the periodical subscriptions so that
most libraries and information agencies no longer own current STM
content.
Instead, it is leased on an annual basis with use varying according to
the licensing agreement. Thus, ownership of content is notably
different today than before. Some libraries have been successful in
negotiating licensing agreements that allow the library to retain
content for the years when the license was active.
Besides periodicals and reference works [especially dictionaries,
encyclopedias, handbooks and companions], standards [both domestic and
foreign] are important in engineering libraries and some science
libraries. Some science libraries will also have consumer science
collections to promote science literacy.
Although relatively new and not very successful, the institutional
repository hosted by the library or the information center is both an
important opportunity and a challenge. Given the importance of
preservation and intellectual access, it makes sense that the library
would be the logical host for an institutional repository. This gives
the library an important new role in collecting and making available
both STM data and also the resulting research products.
Although more popular in technology disciplines than science ones,
collections of digital books, often of the handbook type are
increasingly popular since they answer many relatively quick "how do I"
questions.
While libraries have long housed retrospective collections and some
academic libraries have housed institutional archives, growing interest
in institutional repositories or digital archives have increased
interest in digital content management for a variety of types of
content including research data [data archives], drafts of research
papers [eprints], and the final research publication. This is an
expensive, challenging responsibility and not all librarians are eager
to assume the burden. Still, it represents a substantial opportunity
for information professionals to work with engineers and scientists to
insure that their work is and will be intellectually and physically
accessible.
To some extent, the digital databases, especially in research
extensive corporate and academic environments, have replaced the need
for ILL. At the same time, government agencies, foundations, and some
corporations have made substantial collections of technical reports
available on the Internet. Institutional repositories and individual
researcher websites have also increased access to research results and,
to some degree, to the research data. Most of the STM content made
available to researchers actually comes from distant servers so distant
collections are increasingly the norm. Note that with leased
collections there are no "first sale rights."
How might STM collections differ from those supporting non-STM
subjects?
While libraries and information centers have long circulated new
books lists and journal issues received, IT software allows a more
personalized or individualized approach, often beginning with a
personalized user library home page rather like the Google home page
where the user can select links to those sources of immediate interest
for one stop shopping. A science library might include a summary of
world news along with a summary of science news as a broader context
for the alerting effort.
STM special libraries pioneered "systematic dissemination of
information" many years ago. This was the first major use of an
alerting service which matched the researcher's current interests with
incoming scientific content. The matching and alerting can now be done
much easier with computer assistance. The basic outline is simple. The
researcher, using standard subject headings, identifies a small number
of terms, that concern him or her. The library tags incoming materials
or uses existing tags that accompany the content and alert the
researcher whenever there is a match. Some databases allow users to
establish such profiles and be notified when a "hit" is added to the
database.
Alerting services may range from the general such as new books, new
databases, new websites [website of the month or similar] or
similar within the broader discipline to
alerting services that are tailored to individual preferences. The
later is more likely to be found in a corporate environment. Users are
fond of altering services that provide a reasonable amount of
individualization. Since info glut is a problem everywhere, filtering
services are valuable and save much user time and effort. The better
alerts would likely contain some evaluative information so they
also function as brief reviews rather than just an announcement.
RSS feeds and blogs [they often have RSS feeds too] are popular ways
to alert users to new services and items in the collection. Since they
are "pushed" to the user [read on a news reader],
little user effort is required to keep up. Blogs have an advantage of
providing an opportunity for commentary and interaction, provoking user
interest in scientific, scholarly communication issues. A few academic
libraries will also use a wiki to provide access to
relevant
information.
A very few libraries are using social networking approaches to
create subject guides or even add user-provided subject headings to the
catalog.
Which alerting services would you find most useful [as a
student, as a faculty member, as a researcher]?
In the olden days, "bibliographic" instruction was often
used for this activity. That seems less appropriate today so "library"
instruction is more popular. Still, it may be better to consider
alternative labels since what is needed is not instruction in how to
use the "library," but rather instruction in effective use of complex
secondary sources.
The most visible instructional effort in the traditional library was
the guide or the pathfinder providing a short
list of recommended sources along with tips/suggestions on what to do
first, second, and so on. Nearly all STM libraries, especially in
academe, have digital versions of these guides on their websites and
they constitute a form of de facto instruction. In a science and
engineering library, guides would be available for astronomy through
zoology. In an astronomy library, guides would be available for
sub-disciplines or specific research areas.
Clearly, as reference questions decline rapidly, as fewer users
actually walk through library doors, the importance of the teacher -
librarian becomes much more visible. The evidence is also overwhelming
that instruction works best when available exactly when needed.
Instruction may be:
A variety of formats may be used for point of use instruction
including hard copy and digital guides and pathfinders as well as
online tutorials including real time assessments of understanding and
competence. While podcasts are normally associated with STM faculty,
library faculty may use audio or a-v podcasts for a variety of
orientation and instructional instruction moments.
Typically, workshops or seminars focus on applying new technologies
or new content sources such as a new database. There is increased
emphasis on skill-based rather than tool-based subjects.
Most colleges and universities provide course management
systems [BlackBoard is an example] that allow teachers to integrate a
wide variety of instructional content and techniques. Part of this
integration is the inclusion of relevant content
on the site devoted to a particular course or section. Ideally, and
increasingly done, library resources including digital reserves, would
be accessed from the course page. This means that the student would not
need to go to the library website but would simply click on a link
available on BB and go directly to the relevant content or resource.
The good news is that this allows for tight integration of library
resources with instruction. The bad news is that this further
discourages students from visiting the physical library.
As more academic libraries acquire site licenses for bibliographic
software such as RefWorks, there is a need to provide instruction in
how to use the
software, how to handle problems related to particular style guides,
and how to handle local rules or norms related to the thesis or the
dissertation. As more institutions require digital theses and
dissertations, this too provides an instructional opportunity.
Although the design of effective, usable websites may be taught in a
variety of places on a campus or within a corporation, it is a role
that some libraries have assumed. Thus, there are short courses and
workshops on design and usability issues as well as more specific
topics such as css and xhtml or even effective use of Photoshop or
Illustrator or Dreamweaver.
Historically, most library instruction focused on how to find, evaluate, and retrieve content to meet a particular need. That need continues today. The number of STM databases has increased notably as has their complexity in many cases. Multi-disciplinary research often requires scientists and engineers to find content beyond their own specialty. Academic science education still neglects instruction in this area. The ideal is for the information professional to partner with the classroom teacher or researcher to provide point-of-use instruction that matches an appropriate and challenging assignment. In many libraries, guides or pathfinders have been created to allow users to have access to instruction whenever it is needed. Some STM libraries have created tutorials for major databases that provide opportunities for users to learn and test their competency.
While walk-in traffic has notably declined, many STM libraries
provide "ask-a-librarian service" via the web with IM being
particularly popular with undergraduates. If staffed 24/7, these
can be especially popular with those who work in the lab in evenings
and weekends and have difficulty in getting to the library.
Normally, the essential digital databases would have highly visible
links on the library's home page so that Biological Abstracts would be
clearly visible without scrolling on the biology library home page.
Most STM libraries will have guides and pathfinders on particular
topics readily available. If well done
and highly visible, these may substantially reduce the need for
one-on-one reference work as well as group instruction.
Besides technical reports, scientific libraries increasingly provide
assistance in finding patents and standards [engineering in
particular]. Expensive databases simplify this, but still require time
and effort
Although still relatively rare, a few academic libraries allow
patron tagging of library content to facilitate access.
Teaching requires both skills and the right
manner/style/personality. Some relevant education/training is needed
and often it is a notable challenge to persuade faculty or others to
provide the time needed for this instruction. Sometimes it is a
challenge just to develop a relationship so that the information
professional clearly understands instructional goals, objectives, and
assignments.
Although rare, a few STM libraries provide consumer science
information. For example, a veterinary medicine library provides
bibliographies for pet owners and a pet care home page. A general
science library provides a directory of useful websites for science
fair projects. There are some interesting possibilities here for
collaboration between the science library and other non-profit
community organizations including public libraries.
One of the most popular innovations in the last few years has been
the development of the information commons which is a
single service
point combining IT help desk and reference desk functions. This means
that the user can go to one spot to have questions answered that deal
with any aspect of information technology as well as finding
information on various subjects. Since so much contemporary content is
digital, questions on how to print, email, capture digital content are
common as are questions about passwords and net connectivity.
It's interesting that several years ago, there was a spurt of
articles suggesting that the library and the computing center would
merge to form a single information agency. While that has not happened,
the information commons validates the notion that IT and other
information services are interdependent.
What are the major assets and liabilities of such an
arrangement?
