OIT Support Lines 8:00AM -
5:00PM Monday-Friday
Phone: (865) 974-9900
Walk-in Consulting at 104 Aconda Court - Helpdesk Contact Form |
Technology Advisory Board (TAB)
Minutes of Meeting of March 26, 2003
Location: 4th Floor Conference Room, Andy Holt Tower
Time: 2:00 - 3:00PM
Attendance:
Members: Bill Britten, Stephen Esposito, Jim Gehlhar, Marcel Grubert,
Ray Hamilton, James Hughes, Matt Johnson, Lori Jones, Bryce McKenzie, Faye
Muly, Marla Peterson,
Stan Pinkleton, and Fred Tompkins
Others: Michael Burke, Bill Dunne, Nancy Gnilka, Robin McNeil,
and Judy Travis
Co-Chair Matt Johnson opened the meeting at 2pm.
Distributed Technical Support for Colleges and Departments
Since the inception
of the technology fee much of the funding in the academic departmental lab
area has been focused on upgrading hardware. This year,
in response to the many requests by Deans and Department Heads for technical
support in their budgetary meetings, advisory groups, etc. it has become
apparent the technology fee should refocus on departmental lab technical
and software support needs.
Ms. Faye Muly presented an outline of a proposed distributed technology support
program where OIT would provide technical support for classroom support, instructional
project development, and departmental computer labs funded through the technology
fee. A pilot project combining elements of the START proposal and departmental
computer lab support would be undertaken whereby four areas would be selected
to receive on-site technical support. Since each college or academic department
has different technology support needs, the Provost would set the college selection
priorities similar to the process where the Deans currently set the priorities
for the yearly technology fee funding proposals submitted by their colleges.
The program’s intent would not be to provide permanent technical support
for a college, but rather would run for a period of time determined in conjunction
with the Provost’s office depending on the particular technical support
needs of a college and their ability to provide and sustain technical support
on their own. For instance, as expertise grows within a college, the support
may be shifted to another college where the need may now be greater.
Also an accountability function will be built into the program. At the end
of each year an assessment will be made in which the personnel and services
provided will be evaluated for appropriateness and effectiveness.
In order to be able to able to provide services starting in January 2004,
an aggressive schedule needs to be set. We are recommending that a needs assessment
survey be sent out to the dean of each college in April to solicit input for
defining the various levels of technical support needed. The survey would be
evaluated in May. By June the proposal process would be developed. It would
be similar in structure to the procedures used to govern the current departmental
lab technology fee funding process. In July we would have a call for proposals
which would close early in September. Awards would be made in October. The
goal would then be to hire and place personnel in the colleges by January.
Dr. Michael Burke indicated any questions, comments, or suggestions concerning
the START proposal should be directed to him. (Email to mburke@utk.edu or telephone
974-8893)
Enhanced Departmental Lab Software Support
Next, Ms. Gnilka reviewed the enhanced
departmental lab software support project which was discussed in earlier
TAB meetings. In previous meetings
it was established
the technology fee funding would be expanded for departmental labs on a
continuous basis so that departmental labs could be assured of continuous support
for
much needed software for the teaching and learning environment. One of
the concerns was how to gather information about departmental labs software
needs.
The survey being put together for the distributed departmental lab support
project will also include a section on software needs for teaching and
learning and departmental labs.
FY04 Technology Fee Departmental Lab Funding Recommendation
Ms. Gnilka handed
out a spreadsheet which summarized the FY04 Technology Fee Departmental Lab
Funding requests and this year’s recommendations.
There were approximately seventy proposals received. Six were requests for
new labs with three being for fixed lab environments and three for mobile
labs (laptops on a cart). Ms. Gnilka also noted the spreadsheet this year
reflects the new emphasis on supporting departmental lab software by splitting
it out and putting it in an award category of its own.
Every year there are more and more pockets of small departmental labs appearing
on campus with each requiring a great deal of technical support as well as
hardware and software replacement every two or three years. This represents
an enormous investment on the part of the university. Such growth is not sustainable
by the colleges and departments under the current and most likely future budgets.
Many of these colleges and departments request technology fee funding to either
start up a new lab or to fund it entirely.
Ms. Gnilka asked the TAB members to think about the ever-expanding new lab
phenomenon, and suggested perhaps the guidelines for the FY05 Technology Fee
funding be revised to reflect emphasis for the next few years on sustaining
and enhancing current departmental lab environments.
General
The next meeting of the Technology Advisory Board will be Wednesday,
April 16, 2003, at 2:00PM in the Andy Holt Tower 4th floor conference room.
With
no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
|