OIT Support Lines 8:00AM -
5:00PM Monday-Friday
Phone: (865) 974-9900
Walk-in Consulting at 104 Aconda Court - Helpdesk Contact Form |
Technology Advisory Board (TAB)
Minutes of Meeting of September 15, 1999
Location: Andy Holt Tower, 4th floor conference room
Time: 2:00 - 3:05pm
Attendance
Members: Bill Britten, Will Carver, Matt Disney, Jim Gehlar, Mark Hall, Dewitt
Latimer, Joshua Morrison, Faye Muly, Fernando Parrado, Surya Singh, Kenneth
Walker, Clifton Woods,
Others: Frances Fogerson, Nancy Gnilka, Ray Hamilton, Julie Little, Larry Stiles
Discussion 1: Roster of TAB Membership
Gnilka distributed a sign-in sheet, which classified members by category:
voting members, ex officio members, and others. Those attending were asked
to sign the sheet in the appropriate space to indicate their voting status
and affiliation. This process brought attention to the recent Office of Administration
and Student Affairs reorganization, which separated Administration from Student
Affairs. It was noted they would like two people, rather than one, to represent
these areas. This raised the issue of whether there should be an additional
voting member bringing the total to fourteen. It was proposed this change to
the by-laws be presented in the next meeting.
Disney stated there was some ambiguity in the membership status of some of
the currently appointed student members. With appointments being for 2-year
terms, some students graduate, become inactive, or otherwise change their status
during that length of time. Current student members will be contacted to determine
their continued eligibility and interest in serving.
Discussion 2: Proposed By-Law Revisions
Gnilka reviewed two proposed revisions to the by-laws. The first revision
related to title changes and additions to the ex officio membership, resulting
from the realignment within DII. The second proposal reduced the number of
meetings from one per month to six per year. Under one option, meetings would
occur during the "working months" of the academic year (September,
October, November, February, March, and April). Another option suggested alternating
months (August, October, December, February, April, and June).
The proposed change in DII titles was accepted without discussion. The proposal
to adopt a reduced meeting schedule was approved after adding a July meeting
to the "working months" option.
Discussion 3: Banner Update
Larry Stiles, Chair of the Banner Advisory Committee, discussed the current
implementation status of the Banner student services system. He noted a search
for the system began in 1997. Six study groups judged the Banner system was
the most appropriate solution available at the time. Subsequently many modifications
were proposed, requiring approximately 17,000 man-hours to implement. In addition,
there would be significant on-going resources needed to maintain the modifications
with each new release of Banner.
In March 1999, a consortium of colleges and universities using the Banner
system jointly agreed making extensive changes for individual schools would
be exorbitant in cost, as well as inefficient. The group proposed major changes
be uniform across the consortium. Stiles noted, however, it is still possible
for UT to tailor its own modifications, keeping in mind maintenance would be
UT's responsibility.
The UTK Advisory Committee now focuses on implementation of the Banner system
and also the life-extension efforts for the legacy system, specifically on
improving student access to data. This translates to self-service web access
where possible.
Responding to a question about on-line registration, Stiles stated the current
telephone registration system can handle 100 calls at a time. A web-based system
would increase that to about 1600, an immediate improvement on congestion.
Discussion 4: Name and Scope of TAB
Latimer asked for clarification of the official name of the TAB group (Technology
Fee Advisory Board or Technology Advisory Board). He stated the latter implied
a much broader campus role.
Muly indicated the name was Technology Advisory Board, but also acknowledged
there are a number of other campus groups focused on technology. Woods stated
increased communication with these groups would be mutually beneficial, and
Muly suggested Linda Painter of the Information Technology University Task
Force be invited to the next meeting.
Disney commended the board for raising such issues and offering positive input
and conclusions.
The next meeting will be October 20, 1999 in the 4th floor conference room
of Andy Holt Tower.
Minutes prepared by: Frances Fogerson
|