Office of Information Technology |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Technology Appropriations Board
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| Sue Mettlen (Co-Chair) | Rob Power (Co-Chair) |
| Julie Blair | Faye Muly |
| Bill Drumright | Jerry Stoneking |
| Ray Hamilton | Ramsey Valentine |
| Tamara Miller | Ken Walker |
| Ed Mahon |
A variety of policy issues were discussed related to departmental computing
laboratories, including; purchase or lease of computer equipment, equipment
to be funded, yearly continuation of software licensing, and appropriate means
of modifying requests.
The issue of whether to purchase or to lease computer equipment
for the departmental computing laboratories was discussed, and the consensus
of the board was
to pursue a leasing agreement for the basic computer equipment. A number
of factors were considered.
Prior to implementation of the technology fee, annual equipment funding
was not sufficiently secure to allow widespread use of leasing, whereas,
the technology
fee provides an on-going revenue stream that makes this possible. A major
advantage to leasing is reducing the risk from technological change, enabling
the renewal
of equipment as products change. Although the total cost may be greater than
for an outright purchase, it will not be more than actually replacing equipment
in response to need and technological change. A flexible leasing agreement
will allow the purchase at the end of the lease period, and thus, there is
still the possibility of shifting equipment to areas with lesser requirements.
Leasing will significantly stretch the technology fee budget for this fiscal
year, making possible the funding of additional departmental computing labs.
It was noted that this has direct benefit to currently enrolled students,
who will have available the new equipment during their academic career.
Policies regarding equipment eligible to be funded by the technology fee were discussed. The primary intention is to fund computer hardware, software, and printers. Scanners, digital cameras, and other peripheral equipment may be funded, if the request includes a compelling reason for inclusion in the laboratory plan. Space renovation costs and furniture costs (desks and chairs) will not be considered for funding by the technology fee. The policy was reaffirmed that all technology fee funds must be utilized for equipment for student use or in support of instruction.
The need to provide on-going support for software selected for funding was discussed. It was agreed that license renewal will be evaluated annually, based on need. In general, technology fee funds will be utilized for basic and widely used software. For specialized software, technology fee funding will be made available for central coordination of the negotiation and administration of contracts and licenses, but the base cost will be transferred to the end user. There was consensus that the administration of software contracts and licenses requires significant effort and this service, coordinated centrally, is of benefit to the general campus community.
It is recognized that modifications may be made in the original equipment requests, based on technology updates or changes in curriculum. However, it was recommended that proposals not be considered for additional funding if the scope of the proposal has been significantly expanded, or there has been a major change in purpose. The rationale for all amendments must be fully explained and supported in a memo to the Vice Chancellor. The final funding grant will be confirmed by a memo of understanding from the Vice Chancellor to the department making the request.
|
Question concerning this site may be sent to the webmaster. Copyright ©2003 The University of Tennessee · Knoxville Tennessee 37996 · |
|