Teaching Philosophy for J. Stephen Pearson

Teaching appeals to me for its combination of speculation and interaction, for the challenge of explaining difficult ideas, and for the wonderful moments when students “get it.” It is serious play, a search for wisdom in knowledge. Good teachers inspire us to think boldly and to make a difference in the world. My teachers have taught me about my world, my life, my responsibilities and my potential, and I want to do the same for my students.

I present learning as problem-solving. When encountering a text, we face the question how to interpret it. What is knowledge in literary studies? What kinds of questions are useful for literature, and what methods do we use to answer them? How do we uncover evidence that would help us answer our questions? In the classroom, I guide the students through these questions, making the process of interpretation (in any field) as important as the content. I combine close reading with open discussion, pointing out that in intellectual discourse, we must weigh our opinions against both the clues in the text and the evaluations of our colleagues. Discussion is as important as careful reading, as we must learn to recognize when differing opinions are conflicting and when they are complementary.

Insofar as writing is another form of learning, it too requires problem-solving, this time regarding the presentation of ideas: how to organize and explain the evidence in a way that is clear, persuasive and interesting? I stress the process here as well (thanks to my coursework in the Writing Intensive Program), working individually with students to discover their particular habits and abilities and to show them how to play to their strengths and to the needs of their majors. These writing conferences have been especially useful in helping my non-majors connect the skills I teach to the skills they need in their own fields. It is great when these students tell me they want to read more literature because of my class.

We must also ask why we should interpret texts. Because books transform the way we think, the students themselves become part of the course content. Both religious and minority literature oblige us to reconsider the ways we interact with the world. Minority literature reveals how the material and institutional aspects of our culture affect our struggle to achieve our national ideal of equal opportunity for all people. Reading it, we are challenged to seek new ways to realize America—another level of problem-solving. Similarly, religious literature challenges us to seek new ways to realize our own humanity by inviting us to contemplate our relation to those things that transcend the material and institutional world.

Here again, content is balanced by process; the problem to be solved is how we should live. As humans, we have amazing potential—for thought, for beauty, and for compassion. It is our responsibility to use that potential wisely, and to pass that wisdom on to our students.