Site
Index


Budget Committee Meeting
September 10, 2001


MINUTES
prepared by Beauvais Lyons

Present: Lyons, Cross, Gross, Hamilton, Hedrick, Labotka, Moran, Mulkey, Reidy.
Absent: Scheurer, Davis, Peterson

I. CALL TO ORDER , 3:40pm

II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA, approved by consensus

III. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
Gross moved, Mulkey seconded, Motion approved
IV. REPORTS
  1. Mark Hedrick reported that the Task Force on Contingent Employees has not met yet this semester. They plan to divide into several study groups to look at issues such as contingent employee rates in peer institutions, history of the growth of contingent employees at UT, etc. Jim Moran stressed the central issue is the rate of pay for contingent faculty, encouraging the task force to look at increasing the level of compensation.

  2. Ray Hamilton reported for Sylvia Davis that hearings are being held this week to look at reallocation of 4-6% of resources toward areas of strength. He indicated that the APEC assessment would be used in part to guide this process. He stated that the state has mandated that UT set-aside 1% of its state appropriation (1.6 million dollars) in case sate collections fall short of projections. At this point a merit pool for the end of the year is being postponed for the same reason. There was discussion of, and questions about proceeds from the UT Hospital and the role of the Law School in relation to the mission of UT.
V. PREVIOUS BUSINESS, None

VI. NEW BUSINESS: Outline of Budget Committee Goals for the Year
The committee discussed the following issues, and arrived at the following action plans:
Faculty Salaries: The committee will repeat its study of faculty salaries for the third year in a row. There will be an effort to adjust data from SUG, THEC and Top 25 institutions to reflect salary changes from October 2000 to October 2001, which is the payroll date for UT statistics in the study. An effort will be made to have the data for the committee by our January 23rd meeting.

Living Wage: While the Spring 2001 Living Wage Resolution will continue to be followed, the committee will look at the feasibility of using an Equal Dollar Amount Raise for future cost of living raises for state or university employees. David Reidy will research the state legislature's use of "across the board" system of distributing across the board raises.

Auxiliary Enterprises: Lou Gross expressed concern regarding whether all auxiliary enterprises are contributing fully to covering their F&A costs. He noted that the Athletics Department does not compensate the university for any of its legal services. Concern was also expressed regarding the lack of compliance by the Athletic Department in the Spring Budget Hearings. Beauvais indicated that he will request a copy of the Athletic Department budget for the committee, and will discuss with Sylvia Davis the need to report on how auxiliary budgets are monitored.

IRIS SAP: Lou Gross expressed concern about the cost benefit of IRIS SAP. Sylvia Davis will be asked to report on this at the next meeting.
VII. GOOD OF THE ORDER
no discussion
VIII. ADJOURNMENT, 5:15pm


Budget Committee Meeting
October 8, 2001


MINUTES
prepared by Beauvais Lyons

Members Present: Lyons (Chair) , Gross, Hedrick, Moran, Reidy, Scheurer, Davis, Peterson, Chesney

Members Absent: Cross, Labotka, Mulkey

I. CALL TO ORDER , 3:35 pm

II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA, by consensus

III. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, September 10, 2001, by consensus

IV. REPORTS
  1. Mark Hedrick - Task Force on Contingent Employees
    The task force met last week and is questioning some of the data they have received from the Office of Institutional Research. Using the 14 day roll information they will conduct a pilot sampling of the committee members' departments to check the accuracy of the data. As a point of information, a AAUP web site URL was distributed showing the compensation level for contingent employees in the Boston area: http://www.aaup.org/pttab.htm
  2. Sylvia Davis
V. PREVIOUS BUSINESS
Continued discussion of the Tennessee State Budget and an Equal Raise Proposal for Cost of Living Raises. David Reidy contacted the State Treasurer's office regarding the "across the board" 2.5% raises. (see the 2001 Tennessee State Budget, Chapter 464, section 50, Item 2). The solution to addressing this issue is to work with Tom Ballard to encourage the legislature to grant THEC greater flexibility in distributing future salary pools. David will contact Tom on this matter.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
Creating a Budget Handbook for Faculty, tabled for future action. Two copies of the current UT budget which is prepared for the Board of Trustees we distributed for study.
VII. GOOD OF THE ORDER, none

VIII. ADJOURNMENT, by consensus at 5:10 pm


Budget Committee Meeting
Monday November 12, 2001

MINUTES
prepared by Beauvais Lyons

Members Present: Lyons (Chair), Gross, Hedrick, Reidy, Scheurer, Davis, Peterson, Whelan

Members Absent: Chesney, Moran, Labotka, Mulkey

I. CALL TO ORDER, 3:37 p.m.

II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA with the addition of VI. 2 and IV. 3. Approved by consensus.

III. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
October 8: Gross moved, Whelan seconded to approve as amended. Passed.
October 22: Gross moved, Peterson seconded. Passed.
IV. REPORTS
  1. Mark Hedrick -- Task Force on Contingent Employees
    A draft report from the task force was given to Beauvais Lyons. He will copy and mail to every member of the committee. The report was based on incomplete data from the Office of the Provost and the Office of Institutional Research. It shows that in 1990, 67% of undergraduate FTE's were taught by tenure or tenure-track faculty. In 2000 42% of undergraduate FTE's were taught by tenure or tenure-track faculty. Discussion focused on the need to collect data on the compensation level of contingent faculty, as well as distinguishing between GTA's and faculty when calculating FTE's for large lecture classes with discussion sections. Sylvia Davis indicated that she will check on the limitations of the data the task force received. The problem of how Institutional Research can't provide data that "talks to each other" was also addressed.
  2. David Reidy -- Update on COLA Equal Raise Proposal
    Tennessee State Employees Association was not cooperative in our inquiry regarding an equal COLA raise for state employees. David Reidy contacted Tom Galligan Chair of the Faculty Senate Legislative Committee, who thought it would be difficult to approach the Legislature before addressing the larger question of tax reform. In response to an inquiry from Reidy, Tom Ballard indicated that he would push this issue if directed to do so by the UT President. Sylvia Davis said the critical time period would come after the appropriation bill, suggesting that we encourage greater flexibility for UT in setting its own raise policies.
  3. Sylvia Davis
  4. Beauvais Lyons
    Will request salary data from Don Cunningham in preparation for our annual faculty salary study in the Spring.
V. PREVIOUS BUSINESS

Resolution on UT Payroll Policies --
(note: Due to delay in the implementation of the bi-weekly pay schedule for new employees, I am bringing our previous resolution to you again for consideration):
Whereas the schedule of UT paychecks is important to the financial well-being of UT faculty and staff and modifications to UT pay policies affect all UT employees; and

Whereas the current plan for SAP/IRIS implementation institutes a deferred pay schedule for all UT employees, and would require all monthly employees to move to biweekly pay by January 1, 2003 resulting in a delay of payment for time worked by a period of nine days, and

Whereas starting (what month?) 2002, all new monthly employees are required to be paid biweekly, and their pay will be deferred for nine days, and

Whereas such a pay schedule would cause an immediate hardship on the affected employees, and

Whereas the University's financial situation has already caused great concern over employee morale and retention, adversely affecting our ability to attract high quality faculty and staff, and

Whereas it is imperative that UT not institute new policies that would be viewed by many employees as detrimental, and

Whereas there is no plan in place to recompense employees for the interest that could accrue from the deferred pay over the time period of employment, and

Whereas while some employees may find a biweekly paycheck to be personally beneficial, the current plan would not provide equal pay in each pay period, but a varying amount dependent upon the deduction schedule that varies from individual to individual,

Therefore, be it resolved that,

The Faculty Senate urge the UT administration to offer options for faculty and staff regarding payroll. In particular, we urge that the option to be paid monthly without any deferral of pay (as is the current norm) be made available for both current and new monthly employees. Alternatively, if a biweekly payroll is viewed as a necessity, we urge that this be carried out in a non-deferred manner, with the capability to provide relatively equal payments during each biweekly period.
Lou Gross moved and David Reidy seconded to table the resolution until the March Budget Committee meeting. The argument was made that the resolution would have more impact on planning the HR component of IRIS if it was approved at the end of the academic year. Motion passed. (Note: This resolution will be introduced at the February 25 meeting, as there is not a March meeting scheduled).

VI. NEW BUSINESS
  1. Making the Budget and Budget Process More Transparent
    Based on discussions with Provost Crabtree at the October 22 Budget meeting, the concept of requesting monthly reports listing assets, expenditures and available resources (base budget funds and one time allocations) are made a regular part of the Budget Committee agenda, and will be posted on the Faculty Senate Web site was discussed. Sylvia Davis it is not entirely practical to generate such a report with an incremental budget. It might be possible to generate such reports at key points during the year, such as when 14 day enrollment reports are generated. She indicated that Provost Crabtree has a complete list of discretionary commitments. Discussion focused on ways that the budget and budget process can be made more transparent. Davis indicated that she is beginning to work on rules for SAC re-accreditation (in 2005) and hopes that this will help to guide greater faculty involvement in the budgetary process.

    The recommendation that the Chair of the Faculty Senate Budget Committee (or another faculty member) be appointed the Executive Budget Committee for UTK was addressed. This committee has not met regularly. Concern was expressed that there is continuity in faculty representation on this committee. Lyons will ask Provost Crabtree who is currently on this committee.

    Sylvia Davis outlined some categories the Executive Budget Committee has used recently to look at allocations of resources. These included prior commitments, technology needs, highest priorities and space allocations. She indicated that she would share this information with the committee.

    After some discussion, it was agreed that the Budget Committee should take a more active role in attending the March-April Budgetary Hearings and conduct a follow-up meeting with the Provost to offer suggestions on setting priorities. Lyons suggested that the Budget Committee should develop a set of 2-3 questions to be addressed by all presenters at the hearings. Deliberation on what these questions should be will be considered at the January 23rd meeting. (note: Please forward suggestions in advance of the meeting).
  2. Budget Committee and Research Focus Area Connections
    In response to an inquiry from Doug Birdwell, Lou Gross will be the Budget Committee Liaison to the High Performance Computing Task Force. No one was identified to serve as a liaison to the Research Infrastructure area, however, it was suggested to ask Doug to direct questions and inquiries related to Budget to Beauvais.
  3. UT Technology Fee Deferment for UT Family Members
    In response in an inquiry from Jenna Wright, Tennessee Board of Regent Schools pay technology fees for and the UT System does not. Sylvia Davis will provide a cost estimate to UT on this for our January 25th meeting.
VII. GOOD OF THE ORDER
Jay Whelan asked us to consider the cost of in-state tuition at our peer institutions, as well as the level of state support as a percentage of the total budget at such institutions. Lyons said that he will request this information from institutional research.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT, by consensus at 5:30 p.m.


Budget Committee Meeting
January 23, 2002


MINUTES
Prepared by Beauvais Lyons

Members Present: Lyons (Chair) , Gross, Hedrick, Reidy, Scheurer, Davis, Peterson, Moran, Whelan
Members Not Present: Chesney, Mulkey

I. CALL TO ORDER, at 3:36pm

II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA, by consensus

III. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, November 12, 2001 , by consensus

REPORTS
  1. Mark Hedrick--Task Force on Contingent Employees
    The Task Force has a report that will be presented at the Feb. 4th Senate Meeting.
  2. Sylvia Davis--update on status of SAP-IRI
    There are no anticipated changes to the current payroll system, running both bi-weekly and monthly for exempt employees. She advises that the Budget Committee should consider our payroll resolution at our next meeting if there are plans to revise the payroll system. There have been some problems with SAP-IRIS producing reports, and efforts are being taken to address these problems. Davis agreed to be available for a forum preceding a future Faculty Senate Meeting to address problems related to SAP-IRIS.
  3. Beauvais Lyons
    A report on the cost of in-state tuition at our peer institutions, as well as the level of state support as a percentage of the total budget at such institutions was distributed and discussed. This report will be posted on the Faculty Senate web site. Lyons discussed his communications in early January with Provost Crabtree on upcoming faculty merit raises in which he alerted the Provost to the April 2000 Faculty Senate Resolution.
IV. PREVIOUS BUSINESS
  1. Making the Budget and Budget Process More Transparent
    General issues were discussed. While members of the Budget Committee will make an effort to attend the budget hearings this spring, discussion focused on faculty input into how priorities are set for the hearings. Budget scenarios were discussed. No particular recommendations were for endorsed.
  2. Issues to be considered at future meetings include:
    SAC re-accreditation rules regarding faculty involvement in the budgetary process; Current Composition of the Executive Budget Committee; Forming a set of 2-3 questions to be addressed by all presenters at budgetary hearings.
V. NEW BUSINESS
Review of Faculty Salary data
Two spread sheets were reviewed by the committee, on from the Office of Institutional Research and the same date organized by Toby Boulet. A request was made to update the information as follows: The revised spread sheets will be prepared for the next Budget meeting on Monday February 25th.
VI. GOOD OF THE ORDER, no comments

VII. ADJOURNMENT, 5pm


Budget Committee Meeting
February 25, 2002


MINUTES
prepared by Beauvais Lyons

Members Present: Lyons (Chair), Gross, Hederick, Davis, Peterson, Moran, Mulkey
Members Absent: Reidy, Chesney, Whelan, Scheurer

I. CALL TO ORDER, 3:40pm

II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA, approved by consensus

III. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES, January 23, 2001, approved by consensus

REPORTS
  1. Sylvia Davis Reports

    1. report on Strategic Planning Task Force Retreat (2-20-02) Davis Reported on the retreat that was held on Feb. 21, 2002. Goals and objectives were the reviewed at the meeting communication issues will be an important aspect of each objective. Also looking at measurable outcomes for each objective. The tough work is ahead as we make choices on how to fulfill the objectives at the college and dept. level. This may drive the budget process for the hearings in 2003. Peterson asked to what extent will the work we did on APEC relate to the planning process. Davis said that we need to be more focused in directing our resources than APEC.

    2. Sylvia Davis and Loren Crabtree are putting together a contingency faculty task force to look more closely at the data. It may arrive at the same conclusions as the Senate's Task Force on Contingent Employees, but will do so based on accurate data.

  2. Beauvais Lyons Reports

    1. A copy of Lyons' report to Strategic Planning Task Force was distributed as an information item.

    2. The Budget Hearing Schedule was reviewed and scribes were designated. Lyons will forward this set of assignments to the members of the committee. Scribes will be responsible for taking notes and emailing them to Lyons. The committee also decided to add an additional meeting on Thursday March 28th at 3:30pm in the Senate conference room to discuss the hearings. Provost Crabtree will be invited.

    3. Lyons reported on the status of faculty salary data study. He apologized for alck of progress since the last meeting. Moran will take the salary data and try to update as requested at the January meeting. Sylvia will verify if the data includes everything but longevity.

    4. Lyons encouraged members of the committee to begin thinking about selection of the Budget Committee Chair for 2002-2003. He indicated that while he wants to be on the committee next year, he is hoping someone else will assume the chair duties.
IV. PREVIOUS BUSINESS
1. Reconsideration of the Resolution on UT Payroll Policies:
Motion was discussed. Davis reported that faculty and staff exempt employees will remain monthly. The IRIS-SAP payroll system allows for generally 4 payrolls per month; one monthly, two bi-weekly, and longevity. The key issue is that non-exempt staff who chose to switch from monthly to bi-weekly are informed about the 9-day delay in the payment cycle. Davis said they will be informed, and that it is voluntary, except for new employees. It was decided that the resolution was no longer needed. Davis acknowledged that the discussion of the issues in the committee helped to assist in the setting policy on this issue.
V. NEW BUSINESS, no new business

VI. GOOD OF THE ORDER, There was general discussion about budgetary planning and accounts.

VII. ADJOURNMENT, 4:45pm


Senate Directory
   Officers
   Committees
   Members
Governing Documents
   Senate Bylaws
   Faculty Handbook
   Tenure Policy
Search

Reports
Calendar

Archives
Resources

Senate Home


To offer suggestions or comments about this web site, please click here.