IS 585 - Information Technologies
Fall 2007
Instructor: Robert J. Sandusky
E-mail: sandusky at utk dot edu
Office Hours: Thursday, 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM EST, or by arrangement
Meeting Time and Location: Thursday, 9:40 AM - 12:25 PM ET, HSS 68
Course Catalog Description: Evolution, trends, capabilities, and
limitations of technologies applied to information capture, storage, preservation, access,
and distribution.
Objectives: IS 585 provides a broad overview of information and
communications technologies (ICTs) as well as emerging trends and techniques.
At the end of the semester, based upon your personal experiences and the class readings,
lectures and discussion, you will be able to:
- Demonstrate knowledge of the functions of and relationships between computer system components (hardware).
- Demonstrate knowledge of the functions of and relationships between system and application software.
- Demonstrate knowledge of the functions of data communications networks, including the Internet.
- Demonstrate, through completion of assignments and the computer system configuration project, the
ability to identify, evaluate, compare and select hardware, software and network/communications components
appropriate for supporting delivery of information services and resources.
- Demonstrate, through completion of assignments and the term project, knowledge of the architecture and
components used to support current World Wide Web-based information systems.
Required Materials
Readings
There is no specific textbook for this course (but see Recommended Materials, below). Instead,
readings will be assigned each week. Most will be available via the WWW, the UT library
Web site, or the course Blackboard site. Some may also be available via course reserves.
Computing Requirements
Blackboard
The syllabus and other course-related information is available on the Blackboard
system Online@UT at http://online.utk.edu/.
This system provides support for
asynchronous communications for the course. You will need your NetID and password
to access the materials at Online@UT.
System and browser recommendations can be found at
http://online.utk.edu/system_req.shtml.
This page also provides links to other information about the system.
Top
Recommended Materials
Recommended Book
The following book has often been used as a required textbook for this course, and many students
have found the book to be a valuable resource. This book will be on reserve at the library and relevant
chapters will be noted in the recommended readings week by week. The book doesn't change
a lot year by year, so the previous year's edition is quite relevant and considerably
more affordable than the latest version. One disadvantage of this book is that it is
Windows / PC centric.
Shelly, G.B., Cashman, T.J., & Vermaat, M.E. (2007).
Discovering Computers 2007: A Gateway to Information, Web Enhanced, Complete.
ISBN 1-4188-4370-9.
The Web site that supports the textbook is located at
http://www.scsite.com/dc2007/
and provides access to the end-of-chapter material (summary, key terms, review questions,
etc.) in an interactive format. Follow the registration instructions at the site
to gain access to this site.
You may purchase this book at the University bookstore or through an online source. Be sure to check
the ISBN number and make sure it matches what's listed above. The publisher sells other, shorter versions of
this book.
Grades
Grades are based on assignments (30%), the PC configuration project (30%),
class participation and attendance (15%), and the term project (25%).
Your presence and participation is vital to the success of this class: attendance and class
participation are expected and do affect the "participation and attendance" portion of your
final grade. If an absence is unavoidable, please e-mail me before the absence, if at all possible.
Class participation includes contributing during class discussions
— sharing your thoughts and experiences about information technologies — and monitoring
and posting to the asynchronous discussion boards (located on Blackboard) each week. The quality of your
contributions is more important than the quantity of contributions.
Read the assigned materials prior to the class for which they are assigned, and be prepared to
refer to passages or issues of interest to you during our discussions. Ensure your class
participation by responding on Blackboard to the readings, and responding to others'
postings.
If you have questions about the class, look at the "Questions About Class" discussion board.
Please post your questions first to the class bulletin boards located on the Blackboard system
at http://blackboard.utk.edu/webapps/login/
unless the question is of a confidential nature (e.g., grades).
Sharing your questions is helpful because (1) other people may have the same or similar
questions and (2) you may get a faster or better response from other people in the class. I will be
reading the discussion boards almost daily.
The computer configuration project presentation is made near the middle of the term (please
refer to the schedule) and is based upon information prepared in support of your team's
computer configuration project. The computer configuration project is described in the assignments
section of the syllabus.
There will also be a group presentation based upon the work you do for the term project.
You may earn extra credit by attending one or two of the following SIS-sponsored presentations
during the semester:
Relevance in Information Science
2007 Thomson ISI Lazerow Memorial Lecture
Dr. Tefko Seracevic, School of Communication, Information and Library Science, Rutgers University
Wednesday, September 19, 2007, 11:30 - 12:30
UT Hodges Library Auditorium
Note that Eugene Garfield, famed information scientist and the developer of Science Citation
Index will be present at Dr. Saracevic's talk. This is a wonderful chance to meet and talk
to two of the most significant information scientists of our time in an informal and
friendly setting! This is not to be missed!
Library Staff of the Future: Through A Crystal Ball
SIS Research Forum
Rebecca B. Vargha, Information and Library Science Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Friday, October 5, 2007 (time to be announced)
Location to be announced
Abstract:
What does the future hold for information professionals and librarians? Will the MLS continue
to be required? In academic libraries on campus, what does the future look like? With increased
outsourcing of cataloging and virtual reference what will campus librarians do? Will academic
libraries simply operate out of a gigantic warehouse in a place like Dublin, Ohio? What is the future
of corporate information centers and government libraries? The profession is literally evolving
and the only constant is change. Join us for a look ahead, twenty years into the future. Let's
imagine the year is 2026... and we are looking ahead.
Cascading Citations Analysis
SIS Research Forum
Dr. Dimitris Dervos, Professor at the Alexander Technology Educational Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece
Wednesday, October 31, 2007, 11:30 - 12:30
Location to be announced
Abstract:
Dr. Dervos is the winner of the 2005 Thomson ISI Citation Analysis Research Grant for Cascading
Citations Analysis. As the award citation states, "This project will test a new type of citation
metric cascading citations Impact Factor in a scientific literature database. This highly innovative
and mathematically sophisticated research initiative will attempt to solve difficult challenges in
citation analysis and may yield important real-world applications. The research team combines the
theoretical background needed to conceptualize the study with the systems expertise necessary to
its successful completion."
Policy on late submission of assignments and projects: A
minimum of 5% will be deducted from your grade for each 24 hour period your
submission is late. Please contact me prior to any assignment or project due date
(as far in advance as possible) in order to negotiate adjustments due to an emergency.
Final grades will be assigned as follows:
| Letter |
Score (%) |
Semantics |
| A |
92-100 |
Superior performance. |
| B+ |
85-91 |
Better than satisfactory performance. |
| B |
80-84 |
Satisfactory performance. |
| C+ |
75-79 |
Less than satisfactory performance. |
| C |
70-74 |
Performance well below the standard expected of graduate students. |
| D |
60-69 |
Clearly unsatisfactory performance; cannot be used to satisfy degree requirements. |
| F |
0-59 |
Extremely unsatisfactory performance; cannot be used to satisfy degree requirements. |
| I |
N/A |
A temporary grade indicating that the student has performed satisfactorily in the course,
but, due to unforeseen circumstances, has been unable to finish all requirements. An "I"
will not be give to enable a student to do additional work to raise a deficient grade. All
incompletes must be removed within one semester, excluding the summer term. Note that
requests for incompletes are not likely to be approved for undergraduate courses. |
Top
Academic Integrity
University of Tennessee Policy:
"The responsibility for learning is an individual matter. Study, preparation and
presentation should involve at all times the student's own work, unless it has been
clearly specified that work is to be a team effort. Academic honesty
requires that all work presented be the student's own work, not only on
tests, but in themes, papers, homework, and class presentation. There
is a clear distinction between learning new ideas and presenting them
as facts or as answers, and presenting them as one's own ideas. It is
part of the learning process to incorporate the thoughts or ideas of
others into one's own mind and presentations with the purpose of
learning and enlarging on personal boundaries of knowledge."
(Hilltopics: Student Handbook, 2006-2007, p. 40. Available at
http://web.utk.edu/~homepage/hilltopics/HILLTOPICS2006-07.pdf)).
"The University expects that all academic work will provide an honest
reflection of the knowledge and abilities of both students and faculty.
Cheating, plagiarism, fabrication of data, providing unauthorized help,
and other acts of academic dishonesty are abhorrent to the purposes for
which the University exists. In support of its commitment to academic
integrity, the University has adopted an Honor Statement (see page 11)."
(Hilltopics: Student Handbook, 2006-2007, p. 41. Available at
http://web.utk.edu/~homepage/hilltopics/HILLTOPICS2006-07.pdf).
Top
Assignments
Assignment 1 – Software Evaluation
Introduction
One aspect of managing computer systems and services is the evaluation and selection of
software. In this assignment you will evaluate two free systems available on the Internet that
can be used to support the creation and management of Web content by end users. You will construct
and perform this assignment in the context of an information use and creation setting that you
define and recommend one of the systems for use in that specific setting.
Learning Objectives
- Based upon personal interaction with two different Web-based software applications, you
will create a list of criteria for the software system evaluation and selection.
- By applying the list of criteria, you will compare and document the capabilities, features and
suitability of the two systems in the use setting you have defined.
- Based upon the documented comparison, you will recommend one of the systems and
provide a compelling justification for your selection.
Systems to Evaluate
Choose two of the following systems for your evaluation.
- iLabs
at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
http://ilabs.inquiry.uiuc.edu/
"A community Inquiry Laboratory (iLab) is a place where members of a community
come together to develop shared capacity and work on common problems."
"A CIL is most importantly a concept, not a technology in the narrow sense...."
An iLabs tutorial is located at
http://ilabs.inquiry.uiuc.edu/ilab/help/documents/431/home/globstudtutoriall.doc?draft=1&file_id=6.
- "Schtuff
is a FREE Wiki service. A Wiki is a website that lets anyone easily create
and edit pages, promoting group collaboration. Schtuff Wikis are called spaces."
http://www.schtuff.com/
List of the tools available in Schtuff is located at
http://www.schtuff.com/Uses.
-
"wikispaces wikis for everyone."
"Create simple web pages that groups, friends, and families can edit together."
http://www.wikispaces.com/
Examples of wikispaces in use can be found at
http://www.wikispaces.com/examples.
-
"seedwiki: people make the web"
"like email.... online meeting software.... publishing software.... spreadsheet or a database....
web portal.... social networking sites...."
http://www.seedwiki.com/.
-
PBwiki
"Make a free wiki as easily as a peanut butter sandwich."
http://pbwiki.com/
Tour pbwiki at
http://pbwiki.com/tour/1.html.
-
wikidot.com Publishing Network
"Our mission is to provide free and professional wiki publishing, collaboration
and communication solutions to anyone who needs it and wants it."
http://www.wikidot.com/
Features are described at
http://www.wikidot.com/features.
Software Evaluation Criteria
Here are some ideas for evaluation criteria with which to start; you may add others as you see fit.
You don't have to include all of these criteria. Your list should be customized for your defined setting.
- User Features (there will be many of these: login; create spaces; upload documents, etc.)
- Secure login
- Create new information spaces
- Upload text documents
- Categorize information
- Control layout
- Threaded discussions
- Blogging
- Support for multiple languages
- other user features....
- License Terms
- Performance
- Scalability (numbers of users; documents; posts; etc.)
- Usability/understandability given the expected user
- Affective Response
- Information Architecture
- Interface Design / Layout
- Graphic Design
- Registration / Getting Started Process
- Costs (both monetary and support/training/soft costs)
- Privacy and Security
- Other criteria....
Instructions
Your deliverable will consist of (1) a written report and (2) the addition of a new thread to
the Assignment 1 discussion board on Blackboard. The report will be submitted to me
via Blackboard's digital dropbox, and the thread you create will be shared with the
class. Sharing our work and results gives us an opportunity to learn how different
students approached each system, and will let everyone see how all the different
systems work.
The report should be approximately three pages, single spaced (about 1500 words)
excluding any tables and figures. (Feel free to include screen shots, for example, to illustrate particular
strengths or weaknesses.) The report should be well-organized and include clear comparisons of similar features in
the two systems and identify important features that are available in only one of the systems. Imagine
that the report will be read by the person or persons making the decision based on your recommendation (think: your boss).
Take care to ensure that your report is well-written, well-organized, and that salient data
is presented in a way that is useful for the reader. The report
should include:
- a concise description of the setting in which you would imagine
this system being used. Sample settings might be a school or public library; a civic or community
action group; a group research project; a home-schooling support group; an office workplace. Feel free to
base your setting on a situation with which you are personally familiar.
- a prioritized list of at least six distinct evaluation criteria (ranked as high; medium; low priority),
with "User Features" as one of these criteria. Within the "User Features" criterion,
include at least six distinct sub-criteria within the "User Features" criterion.
- discussion of how effectively each of the systems supports each of the criteria you have selected.
- a recommendation that includes clear evidence supporting your recommendation
Your Blackboard thread should be titled with your surname / family name (e.g., "Sandusky") and
the posting should include:
- links to both of the experimental sites you created as you performed your evaluation
- very brief explanation of your scenario - 1 paragraph (copy & paste from your report)
- very brief recommendation - 1 paragraph (copy & paste from your report)
Finally, make respectful, supportive comments on a few others' threads.
Assignment 2 – Computer System Component Evaluation
Introduction
The evaluation and selection of system components is an important aspect of managing computer
systems and services. In this assignment you will evaluate products from one component category that
is being covered during this course. You may want to coordinate with your configuration project team members
and use this assignment as part of the research you do in support of the computer system
configuration project.
The two products you select should be specified down to a model number.
So, comparing AMD to Intel processors is not specific enough: pick two specific models and compare them.
Learning Objectives
- Based upon your evaluation of information about two or more different products within
a specific computer component category (e.g., motherboards, monitors, sound cards, etc.), you
will create a list of criteria for the hardware system evaluation and selection.
- By applying the list of criteria, you will compare and document the capabilities, features and
suitability of the products in the use setting you have defined.
- Based upon the documented comparison, you will recommend one of the products and
provide a compelling justification for your selection.
Computer System Component Evaluation Criteria
Here are some ideas for evaluation criteria with which to start; you may add others as you see fit.
You don't have to include all of these criteria. Your list should be customized for your defined setting.
- Product Features (there will be many of these, some of which will be category specific)
- Ease of installation
- Technical / product support
- Ease of use
- Performance
- Compatibility
- Standards compliance
- Flexibility
- other product features....
- Affective Response
- Interface Design / Layout
- Product Design
- Costs (both monetary and support/training/soft costs)
- Other criteria....
Instructions
Your deliverable, to be submitted using Blackboard's digital dropbox, will be a report of approximately
three pages, single spaced (about 1500 words) excluding any tables and figures. The report should
include clear comparisons of similar features in the products and identify important features that
are available in only one of the products. The report should include:
- a concise description of the setting in which you would imagine
this system being used. Sample settings might be a school or public library; a civic or community
action group; a group research project; a home-schooling support group; an office workplace. Feel free to
base your setting on a situation with which you are personally familiar.
- a prioritized list of at least six distinct evaluation criteria (ranked as high; medium;
low priority).
- discussion of how effectively each of the products supports each of the criteria you have selected.
- a product recommendation that includes clear evidence supporting your recommendation
- references (most likely a URL) to source material for the components you evaluated
Here is a list of some of the components you might want to consider evaluating for
this assignment:
- Processors
- Motherboard
- Memory
- Hard Drives
- CD/DVD Drives
- External/Mobile Storage Devices
- Video Cards
- Sound Cards
- Network Cards
- Display Devices/Monitors
- Speakers
- Printers
- Scanners
- Tape Units (i.e., for large-scale data backups)
Send me an e-mail if you want to choose some other kind of component that you don't
see on this list.
Assignment 3 – Computer-based Training Systems Evaluation
Introduction
Information technologies continue to evolve rapidly. It may be necessary for information professionals
to acquire new or refresh existing competencies to effectively provide services. In this assignment, you
will explore one avenue for competency acquisition or renewal: either online computer-based training (CBT) courses
or tutorials provided as part of application programs.
Learning Objectives
- Based upon selection and completion of one online computer-based training course, you will
acquire or renew competency in one area related to information technology.
- Based upon completion of one CBT course, you will reflect upon your experience with CBT
as a means for acquiring or renewing competency.
Instructions
The University of Tennessee provides the "Skillport CBT" site that contains many CBT courses.
This site is available at http://oit.utk.edu/cbt/.
You have to register, then you can log into the system.
You may choose another kind of CBT if you like, or if you are a Macintosh diehard (the UT
CBT courses work only on PCs). One idea: you might want to work through
the tutorial included in a software package. Dreamweaver 8, for example, includes
a tutorial in it's help system entitled "Getting Started with Dreamweaver." Many
software products include in-depth tutorials. Or, you might find a high-quality
tutorial or course at another location on the Web (but please e-mail me for permission
before you get started on it).
Your deliverable, to be submitted using Blackboard's digital dropbox, will consist of (1) a report of
approximately two pages, single spaced (about 1000 words) excluding any tables and figures and (2) the
addition of a new thread to the Assignment 3 discussion board on Blackboard. The report will be submitted to me
via Blackboard's digital dropbox, and the thread you create will be shared with the
class. Sharing our work and results gives us an opportunity to learn about a variety of
courses and tutorials and different course formats. The report should include:
- a concise description of the course you selected, why you selected it, how it met
a need for you, and your expectations before you took the course.
- reflection on the ways in which the content met
or failed to meet your expectations.
- reflection on the ways in which the CBT format / media
affected your experience and how you might expect CBT to factor into your future professional
experiences.
- evidence of what you did in the tutorial. In the case of the UT CBT courses, provide
a screenshot of a completion / status / grade page when you finish the course. In the case
of another tutorial, provide an appropriate artifact (for example, after completing the
Dreamweaver internal tutorial, you should have one or more Web pages you could zip and
sumbit via the dropbox along with your report).
Your Blackboard thread should be titled with your surname / family name (e.g., "Sandusky")
and the posting should include:
- title of the course / tutorial and where it is located (e.g., at the UT CBT site or within Dreamweaver, etc.)
- very brief reflection on the content and its quality - 1 paragraph (copy & paste from your report)
- very brief reflection on the course format / media - 1 paragraph (copy & paste from your report)
Finally, make respectful, supportive comments on a few others' threads.
Computer System Configuration Project
Due Date
See course schedule.
Introduction
The purpose of this project is to simulate the process of configuring a computer system
that will meet specific needs within a given budget. Students will select one type of
computer system from the list below and then choose hardware and software components for
this system. The component selection process and the final system specification will be
documented in a written report and an in-class presentation.
Project Teams
Students will normally work in self-selected teams of 3-5 members. Those seeking to
form or join a team can post messages to the appropriate discussion board of
http://online.utk.edu/. A mix of skills
and knowledge as well as compatible schedules are good attributes to keep in mind as you
form teams.
Once your team is formed, please send the team name, membership list, and the type of system
you are configuring to me via e-mail. The deadline date for team formation is given in the
course schedule.
Each team will be provided with an area within
http://online.utk.edu/ to support their project.
This area will be accessible only to members of the team, the instructor, and the GTA. You
should use this area to document your individual contributions to the collective project. Note that
some students find working with other freely available online tools preferrable to using
Blackboard's collaboration tools. Examples are Google's collaboration tools ("Docs &
Spreadsheets" (formerly Writely)) or a free wiki site.
If you would like to make use of the capabilities of Centra for a synchronous meeting, please let
the instructor know in advance so that preparations can be made for your meeting.
Team members have joint responsibility for the final product and all members of a team will
receive the same grade for the project. Teams are expected to negotiate the nature and extent
of individual contributions to the project themselves. All team members are expected to
contribute to the technical content of the project.
Most team members will be willing participants in the collective learning process. However,
there are challenges to working in distributed teams and you should be prepared to address
issues that arise. Tips for dealing with unproductive team members can be found in
"Coping with Hitchhikers and Couch Potatoes on Teams," by Barbara Oakley, at
http://ctl.stanford.edu/Tomprof/postings/441.html.
Another, gentler source of ideas, "Small Group Expectations", by Pat Lawton, can be found on the
course Blackboard site in the Course Materials section.
Resources
In selecting components for your system, assume that you will be assembling the system
yourself rather than buying a customized system from a vendor such as Dell, IBM, etc.
Links to price comparison tools and sites featuring hardware / software reviews are
available in the External Links section of
http://online.utk.edu/. A video clip,
in RealMedia format) containing information about OEM and refurbished components is available
from http://digitalmedia.utk.edu/redir/display/r/5529.rm.
Systems
Your group will choose one of the following systems to configure:
- Small Office/Home Office (SOHO): This system will
be used to run "office" applications (word processing, spreadsheets, presentation software, etc.)
and accounting software. It will also be used for e-mail and general Web use. It should
include audio capabilities. The budget for this system is $1,300 not including application
software, operating system costs, rebates, taxes and shipping.
- Home/multimedia: This system will
be used to run "office" applications (word processing, spreadsheets, presentation software, etc.)
and accounting software. It will also be used for e-mail and general Web use. It will also
be used to digitally edit audio and video from an existing analog source. The budget for this
system is $1,500 not including application software, operating system costs, rebates, taxes and
shipping.
- Workgroup server: This system will
be used to provide file and print services to five Windows PCs connected to an existing
Ethernet LAN. You may assume that access to the Internet is available through the existing
network. The budget for this system is $2,600 not including application software, operating
system costs, rebates,
taxes and shipping.
Report
The purpose of the report is to document the component selection process as well as the
final system specification. Your report should include at least the following elements:
- Title page including:
- Project title
- Team member list
- Type of system
- Date
- One-page executive summary of your report
- System description: Describe the anticipated uses of the system, elaborating
as necessary upon the short summary description given in the previous section.
In particular, specify any assumptions you have made about the specific uses of
the system and the use of peripheral components from a previous system.
- System components: Identify each discrete component (e.g., motherboard, case,
boards, etc.) included in your system. Discuss why each has been included in your
system configuration. Discuss the factors you considered in choosing a particular
product. Explain why each factor is important and identify any interdependencies
between components. For example, the style of motherboard and the type of socket
is an important factor in determining the brand and model of processor that can
be used.
- Detailed system configuration: Give a detailed list of all hardware
components included in the system. For each component, identify the:
- Vendor
- Vendor stock/SKU number
- Sale price
- URL of the page containing this information
Provide a total system price, exclusive of operating system and application software,
rebates, taxes, and shipping charges.
- If you are recommending use of a component "bundle," (e.g., a particular motherboard
with a particular processor) to reduce the cost of the system, please discuss the
components (the motherboard and processor) separately in your report.
- Specify which operating system you are recommending, but do not include this
in the cost data.
- You may optionally list other software you would expect to acquire; do not include
this in the cost data.
- Include references, bibliography, footnotes, etc., as appropriate. Use
a consistent formatting style for this information.
The report should contain no more than 2,500 words excluding the title page,
executive summary and end matter. It should be sent to the instructor from
the Digital Drop Box, located in the Student Tools area of
http://online.utk.edu/, on or
before the due date indicated in the schedule. Before submitting your group
report, please enter the group name in the "Title" area and the file format
in the "Comments" area of the file information section of the drop box. Make
sure you press the "Send File" button to send the file to the instructor.
Acceptable file formats are:
- MS Word
- Open Office
- (X)HTML (ensure validity by using a markup validator such as
http://validator.w3.org/.
Invalid markup will not be accepted.)
Report organization, content, style and presentation will all be considered in assessing
the reports, with organization and content being more important than style and presentation.
Graded reports will be returned to you via individual drop boxes.
Your participation in this course indicates that you grant permission for your report to
be made available to other course participants via
http://online.utk.edu/. If you do not want
your work made available, please let the instructor know prior to the project due date and
make alternate submission and distribution arrangements. Student work will be removed from
the course site following the end of the semester.
Presentation
The purpose of the in-class presentation is to give an overview of your group's project,
the process you used, and your results. Prepare slides using a presentation program like
PowerPoint. You must submit your slides to the instructor from
the Digital Drop Box, located in the Student Tools area of
http://online.utk.edu/, on or
before the due date indicated in the schedule. Before submitting your group's
slides, please enter the group name in the "Title" area and the file format
in the "Comments" area of the file information section of the drop box. Make
sure you press the "Send File" button to send the file to the instructor.
Each presentation should last no more than fifteen minutes and will be followed by
a short question and answer session. Each team member should participate in the
delivery of the presentation and to the discussion session.
You should practice the delivery of your presentation prior to the presentation event.
Top
Term Project – Content Management System Project
Due Date
See course schedule.
Introduction
This group project will involve groups of students working to identify, define, and implement
a set of changes to a content management system (CMS) implementation supporting an existing
community. Preparation for this project will begin early in the semester with most of the
work with the community taking place later in the semester. This semester we will be using
Drupal, an open source content management system.
A tentative outline of the activities that will be a part of this project
- each student gets a Drupal instance to use for learning and experimentation
- readings, Web sites, and portions of class time throughout the semester will help
get everyone started using and administering Drupal
- no programming is required to use and configure Drupal
- students will be introduced to the communities participating in the class through
readings, research, visits to class by stakeholders, out-of-class interactions, etc.
- project teams will be formed in early October
- these projects will take a community informatics approach
- if possible, community stakeholders will visit class to hear group presentations in
November
- project teams will create and submit team and individual reports at the end of
the semester
Accommodations
Students with Disabilities
If you need course adaptations or accommodations because of the impact of a disability
or you have emergency information to share, please contact the Office of Disability
Services at 191 Hoskins Library at (865) 974-6087. The ODS coordinates reasonable
accommodations for students with documented disabilities. For more information, see
http://ods.utk.edu/.
Top
Communications Policy
Please post your questions first to the class bulletin boards located on the Blackboard system
at http://online.utk.edu/.
Sharing your questions is helpful because (1) other people may have the same or
similar questions and (2) you may get a faster or better response from other people in the
class. I will be reading the discussion boards almost daily.
I am almost constantly on e-mail and will respond to your questions within 48 hours. Here are
the methods you can use to get in touch with the instructor or the GTA.
Instructor: Robert J. Sandusky
E-mail: sandusky at utk dot edu
Office Phone: (865) 974-2785
Fax: (865) 974-4967
Graduate Teaching Assistant: Brandy Blaylock
E-mail: bblaylo2 at utk dot edu
Mailing Address:
School of Information Sciences
University of Tennessee
451 Communications Bldg.
1345 Circle Park Drive
Knoxville, TN 37996-0341
Top
Schedule
August 23 (Week 1) – Welcome & Course Introduction
Due before class
- Post to the Blackboard discussion boards "Participant Biographies" and "Information Technology Experiences"
by 5:00 PM ET, Friday, August 24
Readings to complete for class
- Syllabus (this entire Web page)
- Nardi, B.A. & O'Day, V.L. (1999). Framing conversations about technology.
Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart.
First Monday, (1999) 4(5),n.p. Available at
http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_5/nardi_chapter2.html.
- Bishop, A. P. & Bruce, B. (2005).
Community informatics: Integrating action, research and learning.
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
31(5), 6-10. Available at
http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Aug-05/bishopbruce.html.
Accessed August 30, 2005.
- Sawyer, S. (2005). Social informatics: Overview, principles and opportunities.
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,
31(4), 9-12. Available at
http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Jun-05/sawyer.html.
Accessed August 30, 2005.
In-class activities
Additional resources
- Chapter One: Introduction to Computers (Discovering Computers)
- Nardi, B.A. & O'Day, V.L. Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
See http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=3420
- Nardi, B.A. & Engeström, Y. (1999). A web on the wind: The structure of invisible work.
(Introduction to a special issue of CSCW).
Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
8(1-2). 1-8.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
August 30 (Week 2) – End-user Applications
Readings to complete for class
- Allen, C. (2004). Tracing the evolution of social software.
Life With Alacrity. Available at
http://www.lifewithalacrity.com/2004/10/tracing_the_evo.html.
- Shirky, C. (2003). Social software and the politics of groups.
Clay Shirky's Writings About the Internet. Available at
http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_politics.html.
- Roush, W. (2005). Social machines. Technology Review,
(08/01/05) 108(8), p. 44. Available at
http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/08/issue/feature_social.asp.
- Stephens, M. (2006). Exploring web 2.0 and libraries.
Library Technology Reports, 42(4), 8-14.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Stephens, M. (2006). Blogs.
Library Technology Reports, 42(4), 15-35.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Stephens, M. (2006). Wikis.
Library Technology Reports, 42(4), 52-57.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
In-class activities
Additional resources
September 6 (Week 3) – The System Unit
Due before class
- Assignment 1 (submit to drop-box before 9:30 AM ET on Thursday, 9/6/2007)
- Post to discussion board entitled "Purchase & Install Memory Exercise"
Readings to complete for class
- Chapter Four: The Components of the System Unit
(Discovering Computers)
- Department of Computer Science, UT. (2006). 01. Overview of computer architecture.
Basics of Computer Science, Animated.
Available at http://www.cs.utk.edu/modules/.
- Department of Computer Science, UT. (2006). 02. Binary representation of numbers.
Basics of Computer Science, Animated.
Available at http://www.cs.utk.edu/modules/.
- Walk through the "Learn How to Purchase and Install Memory in a Computer"
exercise on pages 228-229, steps 1-6 (all steps prior to the step 7 that
begins "Once you have determined.....") to get started thinking about
how to evaluate and think about computer hardware. Use a computer
you have administrator privileges on as your test case. This will be graded on
a pass/fail basis.
In-class activities
Additional resources
September 13 (Week 4) – Input & Output
Due before class
- Computer system configuration project teams finalized. One person from each team sends e-mail
to instructor with list of team members.
Readings to complete for class
- Chapter Five: Input
(Discovering Computers)
- Chapter Six: Output
(Discovering Computers)
- Department of Computer Science, UT. (2006). 03. Binary representation of text.
Basics of Computer Science, Animated.
Available at http://www.cs.utk.edu/modules/.
- Department of Computer Science, UT. (2006). 04. Binary representation of images and sound.
Basics of Computer Science, Animated.
Available at http://www.cs.utk.edu/modules/.
In-class activities
Additional resources
September 20 (Week 5) – Storage
Readings to complete for class Updated! (Sept. 13, 2007)
In-class activities
Additional resources
September 27 (Week 6) – Systems Software & Security
Due before class
- Assignment 2 (submit to drop-box before 9:30 AM ET on Thursday, 9/27/2007)
Readings to complete for class Updated! (September 19, 2007)
- Chapter Eight: Operating Systems and Utility Programs
(Discovering Computers)
- Panko, R.R. (2007). Security. Chapter 9 from
Business Data Networks and Telecommunications. Sixth Edition.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 397-438.
Available via UT Library Course Reserves.
- Watch Drupal 5 Tour at
http://learn.awakenedvoice.com/2007/01/21/drupal-5-tour/
In-class activities
Additional resources
- Panko, R.R. (2007). Hands-On: Windows XP Home Security. Chapter 9a from
Business Data Networks and Telecommunications. Sixth Edition.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 439-468.
Available via UT Library Course Reserves.
- Chapter Eleven: Computer Security, Ethics, and Privacy
(Discovering Computers)
- Apple Computer, Inc. (2005). Mac OS X Tiger Version 10.4 Product Guide. Available at
http://images.apple.com/macosx/pdf/Tiger_Product_Guide_20050628.pdf
- Apple Computer, Inc. (2006). Mac OS X Technology Overview. Available at
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/OSX_Technology_Overview/OSX_Technology_Overview.pdf
-
ubuntu: "Linux for Human Beings."
"Ubuntu is a complete Linux-based operating
system, freely available with both community and professional support.
It is developed by a large community...." Available at
http://www.ubuntu.com/.
This short article on ubuntu describes how it is developed.
Wilson, G. (2005).
African software gains global popularity.
BusinessinAfrica online,
Published: 12-SEP-05.
Available at:
http://www.businessinafrica.net/features/telecoms/484674.htm.
- Digital preservation:
- Systems security:
October 4 (Week 7) – The Internet
Due before class
- Term project teams finalized. One person from each team sends e-mail
to instructor with list of team members.
Readings to complete for class Updated! (September 19, 2007)
- Chapter Two: The Internet and World Wide Web
(Discovering Computers)
- Panko, R.R. (2007). Network standards. Chapter 2 from
Business Data Networks and Telecommunications. Sixth Edition.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 94-139.
Available via UT Library Course Reserves.
- Sandusky, R.J. & Crowe, J. (2007). Growing Distributed Community Content:
Designing a Participatory Content Management System for Rural Youth Photographers
Available at
http://web.utk.edu/~rsandusk/content/pdf/sanduskyCroweDraft.pdf.
- Explore the Growing Tennessee Web site and scan some of the press reports
about the project:
In-class activities
Additional resources
- On network neutrality:
- Felton, E.W. (2006). Nuts and bolts of network neutrality. Center for Information
Technology Policy, Princeton University. Available at
http://itpolicy.cs.princeton.edu/pub/neutrality.pdf.
- Bricklin, D. (2006). Why we don't need QOS: Trains, cars, and Internet quality of service.
From Dan Bricklin's Web Site: www.bricklin.com. Available at
http://www.bricklin.com/qos.htm.
- American Library Association Washington Office. (2006). Network neutrality.
Issue Statement. Available at
http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/techinttele/networkneutrality/netneutrality.htm.
- Center for Democracy & Technology. (2006). Preserving the essential Internet.
June 2006. Available at
http://www.cdt.org/speech/20060620neutrality.pdf.
- Wu, T. (2006?). Why AT&T's net neutrality concession is a milestone in the
history of the Internet.
From Save the Internet.com. Available at
http://www.savetheinternet.com/=wu.
- Network neutrality. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality.
- Armey, D. (2006). Net ignorance of the christian coalition. Available at
http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6094235.html?tag=st.util.print.
- Fredrickson, C. (2006). Net neutrality or net censorship? (Reply to Dick Armey's article, above.) Available at
http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6097579.html?tag=st.util.print.
- Tady, M. (2006). Congress looks to offer big telecoms 'prize'. The New
Standard. Available at
http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/3315.
- Save the Internet.com. (n.d.). Pro-network neutrality FAQ. Available at
http://www.savetheinternet.com/=faq.
- Hands Off the Internet. (n.d.). Anti-network neutrality FAQ. Available at
http://handsoff.org/hoti_docs/aboutus/principles.shtml.
- Preserving the essential Internet. (2006). Center for Democracy & Technology. Available at
http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/techinttele/networkneutrality/CDTneutrality.pdf.
- Weitzner, D.J. (2006) The neutral Internet: An information architecture for
open societies. (Weitzner is Principal Research Scientist at the MIT
Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.) Available at
http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/WOissues/techinttele/networkneutrality/MITneutrality.pdf.
- Holzmann, G. J. & Pehrson, B. (1994). The first data networks.
Scientific American,
270(1), 124-129.
- Abbate, Janet. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
See http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=4633
- Waldrop, M. Mitchell. The Dream Machine : J.C.R. Licklider and the Revolution That Made Computing Personal.
New York: Viking, 2001.
See http://us.penguingroup.com/nf/Book/BookDisplay/0,,0_014200135X,00.html
- The following list contains some resources for technical information about the Internet
and networking technologies.
- Internet governance is a complex and interesting topic all by itself. The following list
provides some links to key bodies involved in the coordination of the Internet (e.g., IP addresses
and domain name management; standards development).
- IETF: The Internet Engineering Task Force. http://www.ietf.org/.
"The IETF is the protocol engineering and development arm of the Internet.
Though it existed informally for some time, the group was formally established
by the IAB in 1986...."
See the Overview of the IETF at http://www.ietf.org/overview.html
- IAB: The Internet Architecture Board. http://www.iab.org/.
"The IAB is chartered both as a committee of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF) and as an advisory body of the Internet Society (ISOC). Its responsibilities
include architectural oversight of IETF activities, Internet Standards Process oversight
and appeal, and the appointment of the RFC Editor. The IAB is also responsible for the
management of the IETF protocol parameter registries."
See the IAB Overview at http://www.iab.org/about/overview.html
- ISOC: The Internet Society. http://www.isoc.org/.
"The Internet Society is a non-profit, non-governmental, international, professional
membership organization. Its more than 100 organization members and over 20,000 individual
members in over 180 nations worldwide represent a veritable who's who of the Internet
community. You should be a member, too.
The work of the Internet Society focuses on four "pillars:" standards, public policy,
education and training, and membership."
- IANA: The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority. http://www.iana.org/.
"Dedicated to preserving the central coordinating functions of the global Internet
for the public good."
October 11 (Week 8) – Fall Break
October 18 (Week 9) – Communications and Networking
Due before class
- Computer configuration project report due via Digital Dropbox by 9:30 AM ET on 10/18/2007
Readings to complete for class
Updated! (October 9, 2007)
- Chapter Nine: Communications and Networks
(Discovering Computers)
- Department of Computer Science, UT. (2006). 05. Networks and the internet.
Basics of Computer Science, Animated.
Available at http://www.cs.utk.edu/modules/.
- Panko, R.R. (2007). Case study: XTR Consulting: A SOHO network with dedicated
servers. Chapter 1c from
Business Data Networks and Telecommunications. Sixth Edition.
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 77-93.
Available via UT Library Course Reserves.
In-class activities
- Computer configuration project student presentations
- Lecture, discussion
Additional resources
- Comer, D. E. (1995). Internetworking With TCP/IP.
(Third ed.). (Vol. Volume 1: Principles, protocols, and architecture).
Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Tanenbaum, A. S. (1996). Computer Networks.
(Third ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.
- Panko, R. R. (2007). Business Data Networks and Telecommunications.
(Sixth ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
October 25 (Week 10) – Databases and Information Management
Readings to complete for class
Updated! (October 9, 2007)
- Breeding, M. (2005). Wireless basics. Library Technology Reports, 41(5), 13-20.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Breeding, M. (2005). Wireless network configuration and security strategies.
Library Technology Reports, 41(5), 21-30.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Breeding, M. (2005). The library wireless hotspot.
Library Technology Reports, 41(5), 31-36.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Chapter Ten: Database Management
(Discovering Computers)
- The database normalization process is described at the following sites:
- Highly recommended: Haigh, T. (2006). "A veritable bucket of facts": Origins of the data base management system.
ACM SIGMOD Record 35(2), 33-49. Available at:
http://www.sigmod.org/sigmod/record/issues/0606/sigmod-record.june2006.pdf
In-class activities
- Lecture, discussion
- In-class database design session
Additional resources
November 1 (Week 11) – Content Management Systems
Due before class
- Assignment 3 (submit to digital drop-box before 9:30 AM ET on 11/1/2007)
Readings to complete for class Updated! (September 19, 2007)
- Read selections from "Using open source software to design, develop, and deploy a collaborative Web site"
In-class activities
Additional resources
November 8 (Week 12) – Web / Library 2.0
Readings to complete for class
- Garrett, J.J. (2005). Ajax: A new approach to web applications.
Available at:
http://www.adaptivepath.com/publications/essays/archives/000385.php.
- Stephens, M. (2006). Introduction: Creating conversations, connections, and community.
Library Technology Reports, 42(4), 6-7.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Stephens, M. (2006). RSS.
Library Technology Reports, 42(4), 36-44.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Stephens, M. (2006). Instant messaging.
Library Technology Reports, 42(4), 45-51.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Stephens, M. (2006). Flickr.
Library Technology Reports, 42(4), 58-62.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
- Stephens, M. (2006). Putting your library "out there."
Library Technology Reports, 42(4), 63-66.
Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
Enter the journal name into the search box to get to the article.
In-class activities
Additional resources
November 15 (Week 13) – Information Systems Development
Readings to complete for class Updated! (Oct. 31, 2007)
- The Systems Development Environment. (2008). In Hoffer, J.A., George,
J.F., & Valacich, J.S., Modern Systems Analysis and
Design, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Hartmann, D. (2006). Interview: Jim Johnson of the Standish Group. Available at:
http://www.infoq.com/articles/Interview-Johnson-Standish-CHAOS
- Martin, D., Rouncefield, M., O'Neill, J., Hartswood, M., & Randall, D. (2005).
Timing in the art of integration: "That's how the Bastille got stormed". GROUP '05:
ACM 2005 International Conference on Supporting Group Work. Sanibel Island, Florida,
November 6 - 9, 2005, 313-322.
Available at:
http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1100000/1099256/p313-martin.pdf?key1=1099256&key2=9853013611&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=5697151&CFTOKEN=84716284
In-class activities
Additional resources
- Chapter Twelve: Information System Development
(Discovering Computers)
- Scacchi, W. (2002). Understanding the requirements for developing open
source software systems.
IEE Proceedings — Software,
149(1), 24-39. Available at
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/.
- Ewusi-Mensah, K. (1997). Critical issues in abandoned information systems.
Communications of the ACM, 40(9), 74-80.
Available at:
http://linkserv.lib.utk.edu:9003/sfx/az/
- Chapter Thirteen: Programming Languages and Program Development
(Discovering Computers)
- Rosenthal, D.S.H., Robertson, T., Lipkis, T., Reich, V. & Morabito, S.
(2005). Requirements for digital preservation systems: A bottom-up approach.
Available at:
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0509018.
November 22 (Week 14) – Thanksgiving Holiday
November 29 (Week 15) – Project Presentations
In-class activities
- This is the final meeting for the course, featuring student term project group
presentations. The group presentation schedule will be provided.
Friday, December 7 (Week 16) – Project Reports Due
Project reports are due by 23:59 ET (11:59 PM) on Friday, December 7. Submit your group's report
to the digital dropbox in Blackboard.
Top
Updated: 20071031. Copyright 2007 Robert J. Sandusky