|
HW#3: MAGICMERV Computational ExerciseAs we will see in a couple of weeks, the ANSI standards require that the analyst "understand" the effect that changes in MAGICMERV parameters have on k-effective. This exercise will give you a little practice in computing these effects. We will begin with a simple model of a simple stand-alone fissile unit that is similar to (but a bit bigger than) the storage unit we will be using in our in-class studies: =csas25 parm=centrm MAGICMERV exercise 44GROUPNDF5 read composition UO2 1 1 293 92235 100 end end composition read param gen=100000 sig=0.001 npg=10000 nsk=3 end param read geometry global unit 1 cylinder 1 1 8 8 -8 end geometry end data end AssignmentWhat I want you to do is to develop some simple curves to demonstrate the unit's vulnerabilities to changes in several of the MAGICMERV parameters. So, perform and give me a simple writeup of the following parametric studies. Each of them should be a modification of the above deck (i.e., they do NOT build on each other): Fissile mass sensitivityFor this one, vary the volume fraction of the UO2 (without changing anything else) from 0.5 to 1.2 in steps of 0.05, and plot the results.Geometry sensitivityVary the H/D (height to diameter) ratio from 0.2 to 3 in steps of 0.2. Keep the volume of the unit constant.Moderation sensitivityAdd water to material 1 and change the UO2 volume fraction to the values 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0. The water volume fraction should be set at 1 minus the UO2 volume fraction. You can keep the volume of the unit unchanged.Reflection sensitivityAdd a water reflector around the unit (top, bottom, and sides) of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 inches.For each of these, run the Oktoc calculation to a sigma of 0.001, plot up the results in a spreadsheet, and write me up a short description of what you found. Email me a WORD or PDF document of your results (or bring it to class). |