Nonviolence

    Mohandas Gandhi wrote of nonviolence (Ahimsa), "In its negative form, it means not injuring any living being, whether by body or mind. ... In its positive form Ahimsa means the largest love, the greatest charity." Absolute nonviolence is, of course, an ideal, approachable but never wholly attainable. (We cannot survive without eating things that were once alive; we cannot walk without crushing insects or microorganisms.) The boundlessness of such an ideal makes complacency impossible. Since it is never achieved, the quest never ends. One is never "saved" but always on the way.
    What Gandhi hoped to achieve by nonviolence was what he called Truth. Just as scientific truth is unattainable so long as the observer remains biased, so Gandhi believed that spiritual truth is unattainable so long as we remain attached to selfish interests and desires. Only devotion to the ideal of absolute nonviolence ¾ absolute selflessness ¾ enables us to see the world without the binders and filters of the self ¾ to see things in their Truth.
    Gandhi regarded his life as a series of "experiments with truth," which took the form of limiting desires and living as simply as possible. So, for example, he was a vegetarian, subsisting largely on fruit and nuts, a diet not harmful to animals or even to living plants.
    In economics, Gandhi advocated stability, as opposed to growth. The Earth, he said, produces enough for everyone's need, but not for everyone's greed. But he was no lover of poverty, except for the voluntary poverty of the exceptional truth-seeker. On the contrary, much of his work in India was devoted to the alleviation of involuntary poverty and its attendant sense of futility, through programs of economic self-reliance. But he warned of the dangers of unchecked acquisitiveness, both to the individual spirit and to the environment. "I hold," said Gandhi in 1916,

"that economic progress ... is antagonistic to real progress. Hence the ancient ideal has been the limitation of activities promoting wealth. ... That you cannot serve both God and Mammon is an economic truth of the highest value. We have to make our choice. Western nations today are groaning under the heel of the monster-god of materialism. Their moral growth has become stunted. ...

This land of ours was once, we are told, the abode of the gods. It is not possible to conceive gods inhabiting a land which is made hideous by the smoke and the din of mill chimneys and factories and whose roadways are traveled by rushing engines dragging numerous cars crowded by men mostly who know not what they are after."

    Nonviolence, for Gandhi, was incompatible not only with excessive wealth but with waste. One day toward the end of his life, his grandson Arun asked him for a new pencil to do his lessons. "Where is the pencil you had this morning?" Gandhi asked, "It still seemed usable to me." Arun admitted he had thrown it away.
    Though it had grown dark in the meantime, Gandhi gave the Arun a flashlight and told him to find the pencil and bring it back. After much searching, he succeeded and returned triumphantly, hoping to prove to his grandfather that it was indeed too small. But Gandhi was unimpressed. "There are at least ten days use left in this pencil," he said. Then he explained to Arun that pencils are produced by the destruction of trees (a form of violence) and that many people are too poor even to have pencils even of this length. Arun kept the pencil stub, which he used for more than ten days.
    Gandhian morality is endlessly demanding, therefore unpopular. But what if it were widely practiced?

 

Radio Commentary Index
Home