University Honors 348, Sec. 86126
Ethics and Future
Generations
John Nolt
|
Office: |
818 McClung Tower |
Office Phone: |
974-7218 |
|
E-mail: |
Home Phone: |
573-4135 |
|
|
Office hours: |
9-10 MWF |
Web Site: |
Reading Materials: There are no textbooks to buy. All assignments are available on e-reserve from the library or accessible by links below.
About the Course: Traditional ethics has had almost nothing to say about obligations to future generations—and with good reason, for until recently we did not have technology powerful enough to predictably affect the distant future. But now we do. The challenge for contemporary ethics is to create theories, practices and institutions commensurate with our burgeoning power. That challenge is the theme of this course. We’ll begin with a brief look at how current technologies affect the future. Then we’ll examine why traditional ethical theories are not adequate to deal with those effects. The remainder of the course will deal with the effort to construct ethical theories and remake practices and institutions to provide for a hopeful future. Besides the obvious social and political obstacles, we will see that this effort faces imposing conceptual obstacles.
Grades: Grades will be based on two types of assignments, and précis and a final paper, each type counting as 50% of the grade. Précis are short summaries of the day’s reading assignment. These will be assigned frequently throughout the semester. The paper will be 7-10 pages long on a topic that you pick in consultation with me. In the case of borderline grades, classroom participation may be the determining factor.
About Me: I came to UT in 1978 after receiving my Ph.D. from Ohio State with a dissertation in the philosophy of mathematics. After the birth of my daughter in 1985, concern about the world in which my children will live led me into environmental activism, and I began working in environmental philosophy. I have published three books in logic and three on environmental ethics. My non-professional interests include primitive woodworking, bouldering, backpacking, and organic gardening.
Course Calendar|
Date |
Topic |
Reading |
|
1/18 |
Introduction: how we affect future generations |
— |
|
1/25 |
Background in moral theory |
Donald VanDeVeer and Christine Pierce, “An
Introduction to Ethical Theory” |
|
2/1 |
First moves in the debate |
John Nolt, "Fundamentals of Logic," John Nolt, “Arguments for and against Obligations to Future Generations”* and Gregory Kavka, “The Futurity Problem” |
|
2/8 |
Extent of obligations to future generations |
Martin Golding, “Obligations to Future Generations” and Daniel Callahan, “What Obligations Do We Have to Future Generations?” |
|
2/15 |
Nature of obligations to future generations |
John Passmore, “Conservation” |
|
2/22 |
Macroeconomic policy |
Mary B. Williams, “Discounting Versus Maximum Sustainable Yield” |
|
3/1 |
Knowing and shaping future generations |
Brian Norton, “The Ignorance Argument” |
|
3/8 |
Rights of potential people |
Mary Anne Warren, “Do Potential People Have Moral Rights?” and William Anglin, “In Defense of the Potentiality Principle” |
|
3/15 |
The non-identity problem |
Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons, ch. 16 |
|
3/22 |
No Class—Spring Break |
— |
|
3/29 |
The repugnant conclusion |
Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons, ch. 17 |
|
4/4 |
Special Event: Holmes Ralston III, 3:30 |
— |
|
4/5 |
The absurd conclusion |
Derek Parfit, Reasons and Persons, ch. 18 |
|
4/7 |
Special Event: Lisa Newton |
— |
|
4/12 |
Beyond the human species |
Holmes Ralston III, “The River of Life” |
|
4/19 |
Caring about the future |
Thomas H. Thompson, “Are We Obligated to Future Others?” and Earnest Partridge, “Why Care About the Future?” |
|
4/26 |
Personal responsibility Final paper due |
Lisa Newton, “Stewardship: The Responsible Person” |
|
5/5 |
Final discussion, 2:45-4:45 |
— |