Candidate theories may classified according to quantity or quality of value:
quality = the happiness (or whatever makes life worth living) of individual lives
| View | Quantity | Quality | Problems |
| 1 Total Principle
(either impersonal or person-affecting forms) |
Is the only form of value | Has no value | Implies Repugnant Conclusion |
| 2 | Has value | Has value, but a loss of quality can always be outweighed by gain in quantity | More plausible than 1, but still implies Repugnant Conclusion |
| 3 Appeal to the Valueless Level | Has value, but only in lives whose quality is above a certain level (though some lives below that level are personally worth living) | Has value; loss of quality cannot always be outweighed by gain in quantity | Implies (A) and (R)—variants of the absurd conclusion and the repugnant conclusions and mere addition paradox |
| 4 Lexical View (cf. superman and herd) | There is no limit to the positive value of quantity. But in lives whose quality is mediocre, no quantity could be as good one life whose quality is blissful | Has value; loss of quality cannot always be outweighed by gain in quantity | Implies (A) and (R)—variants of the absurd conclusion and the repugnant conclusion and mere addition paradox |
| 5 | As quantity increases, the value of extra quantity asymptotically approaches zero; but the limit at which this occurs is higher the higher the quality | Has value; loss of quality cannot always be outweighed by gain in quantity | More plausible than 6 or 7; but refuted by the Absurd Conclusion |
| 6 Limited Quantity View: it will be worse if there is a smaller total of happiness than there might have been, unless this smaller sum is above a certain limit | Value of quantity has an upper limit, which has already been reached | Has value; loss of quality cannot always be outweighed by gain in quantity | More plausible than 7; but refuted by the Absurd Conclusion |
| 7 Only quality matters (e.g., Average Principles in either impersonal or person-affecting forms) | Has no value | Is the only form of value | Refuted by the Two Hells (406) and by Hell Three (422) |
The Repugnant Conclusion:
For any possible population of at least ten billion people, all with a very high quality of life, there must be some much larger imaginable population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better, even though its members have lives that are barely worth living.
The Two Hells (406):
Hell 2: Last generation consists of 10,000,000 people who suffer just as much for 50 years minus a day.
The Absurd Conclusion: Consider
Variants of Absurd and Repugnant Conclusions
Appeal to Valueless Level Implies variants of the absurd and repugnant conclusions:
(R) If there were 10 billion people with a high quality of life, then there could be a much larger population whose existence would be better, even though its members all have lives barely above the valueless level.
Hence none of the seven views seems to work.