Stat 567:Statistical Reliability
Second Class (September 3, 1997)
Describing Life Distributions. Exponential, Weibull, Gumbel,
and Lognormal Distributions
Class Objectives:
- Learn the key concepts used to describe life distributions: survivor
or reliability function, hazard rate, cummulative hazard rate
- Learn how the concept of aging is used in reliability modeling
- Learn why the exponential distribution is so important in reliability
- Learn why the Weibull distribution is a natural extension of the exponential
distribution
- Learn about the Gumbel and lognormal distributions
Homework Assignments:
- Show that the cumulative hazard function of an increasing hazard (failure)
rate (IFR) distribution is convex (i.e., holds water).
- Show that if T is a positive random variable with an exponential distribution
then:
- Show that if T measured in minutes is exponential with hazard rate
lambda, the T*=T/60 measured in hours is exponential with hazard rate 60
times lambda.
- Show that the Weibull distribution is:
- IFR if the shape parameter is greater than 1
- DFR if the shape parameter is less than 1
- Exponential if the shape parameter is equal to 1
- Show that alpha is the 63.2 percentile of the Weibull distribution
- Take a look at Military
Reliability Standards and Handbooks to learn about MIL-STD-217 and
other military reliability standards.
- Check the web site: Weibull
Data for Parts
Class Outline and Main Points:
- Theoretical arguments in favor of distributions
- Are not based on the central limit theorem
- Are based on notions of aging and wear out
- Are based on extreme-value
theory
- Distribution function
- Hazard (failure) rate and aging
- Constant hazard (failure) rate implies exponential distribution
- Increasing hazard (failure) rate and wear out
- Decreasing hazard (failure) rate and infant mortality
- Exponential distribution
- Weibull and Gumbel distributions
- Normal and Lognormal distribution
Study Questions:
- Review the intuitive explanations that I gave you of f(t)dt and
h(t)dt. What is the difference between these two explanations?
- Why is it sometimes best to estimate the cumulative distribution and
cumulative hazard functions rather than the density and hazard rate functions?
- Why is it that the bath-tub model sometimes does not apply when modeling
electronic parts? Why is it usually applicable when modeling mechanical
parts?
- Why is the Weibull distribution model a natural extension of the exponential
distribution model? Why do engineers like it?
- Burn-in is the name given to the practice of running a batch of parts
for a period of time before shipping. The purpose is to weed out defective
parts. Would the distribution describing the batch of parts be most likely
IFR or DFR? Why?
- Why needing to burn-in parts is considered a less-than-ideal engineering
practice?
- Why is it that the normal distribution does not play its usual central
role with reliability data?
- What are the implications of choosing a Lognormal distribution over
a Weibull distribution when modeling life data?
- How is the normal distribution most commonly used in conjunction with
reliability data?
Do
you have something to tell me?