Results of Student Evaluations - (HRD 562 Summer 1999)
Course
|
Section
|
Semester
|
Course Title | ||
HRD
562
|
Summer
1999
|
Grantwriting and Project Implementation |
Organization | HD |
AD |
NI |
N/A |
1. Students knew at the beginning of the course what all of the requirements would be. | 100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2. Both the daily and long range assignments were clear in terms of what the instructor expected. | 100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3. Assignments and projects were both meaningful and reasonable in terms of the course objectives. | 23 |
77 |
0 |
0 |
4. Adequate time was allowed for student to complete the assignments and projects. | 23 |
77 |
0 |
0 |
Course Content | HD |
AD |
NI |
N/A |
1. The objectives of the course were clear from the beginning of the course. | 8 |
92 |
0 |
0 |
2. The instructor manifested competency to handle the subject; he/she appeared knowledgeable. | 100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3. The content of the course warranted its constituting a separate course (no serious over-lapping other courses). | 54 |
15 |
0 |
31 |
4. Concepts and attitudes, as well as skills were emphasized rather than facts alone. | 85 |
8 |
0 |
7 |
Procedures, Methods | HD |
AD |
NI |
N/A |
1. There was opportunity for students to pursue their own special interests within the framework of the course. | 77 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
2. The instructor's lectures seemed well-prepared and stimulating. | 62 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
3. The selection of test(s) and other materials were appropriate in terms of the course objectives. | 77 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
4. The instructor appeared interested in the particular needs and interests of individual students. | 77 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
5. There was ample opportunity for student participation in class discussions; questions were answered. | 85 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
6. The instructor was sensitive to the specific interruptions of the individual student. | 69 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
7. Handouts were appropriate to subject matter. | 85 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
Evaluation | HD |
AD |
NI |
N/A |
1. Evaluation was based on a variety of items. | 92 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
2. The instructor's bases for evaluation were made clear at the beginning of the course. | 92 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
3. It appeared that the instructor adhered to the announced bases for evaluation of student's work. | 92 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
Student Comments (Direct Written Quotes) on Evaluation Form | ||||
What I have liked MOST about this course is: "Critiquing articles; gathering info/tid-bits about grant process; seeing how it compares to what I’ve already done without formal course (solicitation fro personal org., groups); provides the foundation for a process that will need funds for my school; Dr. Brewer’s expertise; future plans to write grants; Dr. Brewer’s jokes; handouts; and interaction with Dr. Brewer." | ||||
What
I have liked LEAST about this course is: "Not enough opportunity
to do group projects—interaction; would be more meaningful
spread out over a full regular semester term instead compressed
in a summer term; presentation of the article; and it was during
the summer." |
||||
My teaching philosophy is similar to Dr. Ed Holton’s and is built on the following principles that he outlined: 1.
Students should have maximum responsibility and involvement in their
learning process. Like many other professors, I am committed to offering courses that maintain an atmosphere of ethical behavior, individual integrity, and equitable treatment of each student. I hope you find the learning in this course applicable to your professional aspirations. |
||||
HD
- To a High Degree AD - Adequately NI - Need Improvement N/A - Not Available |
24
Enrolled
|