Results of Student Evaluations - (HRD 559 - Summer 1997)
|
Course
|
Section
|
Semester
|
Course Title | ||
|
HRD
559
|
Summer
1997
|
||||
| Organization |
HD
|
AD
|
NI
|
N/A
|
| 1. Students knew at the beginning of the course what all of the requirements would be. |
79
|
14
|
0
|
7
|
| 2. Both the daily and long range assignments were clear in terms of what the instructor expected. |
71
|
21
|
7
|
0
|
| 3. Assignments and projects were both meaningful and reasonable in terms of the course objectives. |
71
|
21
|
7
|
0
|
| 4. Adequate time was allowed for student to complete the assignments and projects. |
43
|
36
|
7
|
7
|
| Course Content |
HD
|
AD
|
NI
|
N/A
|
| 1. The objectives of the course were clear from the beginning of the course. |
71
|
29
|
0
|
0
|
| 2. The instructor manifested competency to handle the subject; he/she appeared knowledgeable. |
100
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
| 3. The content of the course warranted its constituting a separate course (no serious over-lapping other courses). |
64
|
14
|
0
|
7
|
| 4. Concepts and attitudes, as well as skills were emphasized rather than facts alone. |
79
|
21
|
0
|
0
|
| Procedures, Methods |
HD
|
AD
|
NI
|
N/A
|
| 1. There was opportunity for students to pursue their own special interests within the framework of the course. |
86
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
| 2. The instructor's lectures seemed well-prepared and stimulating. |
79
|
21
|
0
|
0
|
| 3. The selection of test(s) and other materials were appropriate in terms of the course objectives. |
86
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
| 4. The instructor appeared interested in the particular needs and interests of individual students. |
71
|
29
|
0
|
0
|
| 5. There was ample opportunity for student participation in class discussions; questions were answered. |
93
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
| 6. The instructor was sensitive to the specific interruptions of the individual student. |
79
|
21
|
0
|
10
|
| 7. Handouts were appropriate to subject matter. |
86
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
| Evaluation |
HD
|
AD
|
NI
|
N/A
|
| 1. Evaluation was based on a variety of items. |
86
|
7
|
0
|
7
|
| 2. The instructor's bases for evaluation were made clear at the beginning of the course. |
86
|
14
|
0
|
0
|
| 3. It appeared that the instructor adhered to the announced bases for evaluation of student's work. |
100
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
| Student Comments (Direct Written Quotes) on Evaluation Form | ||||
| What I have liked MOST about this course is: "The final exam was excellent for review. Also, the professor is possibly the most knowledgeable and definitely the most committed I've had; sense of humor of Dr. Brewer; Hardwork of Dr. Brewer; the instructor's enthusiasm and knowledge of the content, yet allowed students to think and research for themselves." | ||||
|
What
I have liked LEAST about this course is: "Better room conditions;
team assignment very frustrating; and the cold room."
|
||||
| HD
- To a High Degree AD - Adequately NI - Need Improvement N/A - Not Available |
14
Enrolled
|