|
Lesson 7: Interaction coefficients
In this lesson, we take concepts that you have already familiar from your
previous study of neutron cross sections and relate them to the slightly
different notation that is predominant in describing photon interactions.
For this course, we need to be familiar with both nomenclatures.
In addition, this lesson describes the scattering interaction coefficients
in terms of distributions in energy and direction for the particle after
the scattering event.
Interaction coefficient = Macroscopic cross-section
In previous courses, you have learned the concept of the macroscopic cross
section, ,
for a material as the probability of interaction per unit path, with units
of .
For photons, the traditional symbol for this is ;
same idea, same unit.
Other variations that your are used to carry over to the new notation:
-
= linear
absorption coefficient
-
= linear
scattering coefficient
-
gives
a collision rate in interactions/cc/sec just like 
-
a given
is associated with a particle type and a particular material
-
is usually
dependent on the energy of the particle, which is denoted as .
This is a function of energy, not a distribution in energy
(the units are still ).
Note: One notational convention that does not carry
over is that we do not use the subscript "t" on
for "total". Instead, the "bare"
corresponds to the neutron notation of macroscopic total cross section .
is referred to as the linear attenuation coefficient, since it is
the coefficient by which a photon population decreases ("attenuates") as
it penetrates a material (i.e., ).
Distributions for scattering cross sections
Another notational similarity with the neutron idea of macroscopic cross
section -- although you may not have seen it in your studies thus far --
is that for scattering interactions the variables that are used
to describe the characteristics of the particle after the collision
are expressed as distributions.
For example, the linear scattering interaction rate for a given material
at a particular energy is denoted as ,
with units of .
But, of course, the particle will emerge from the collision with a different
energy, which we will call
. Generally, for a given initial energy, there many different energies
are possible and we denote the probability distribution for the final energies
as ,
with units of .
This is interpreted in the usual way for a distribution:
=
probability that particle emerges from the collision
with an energy between
and .
This means, of course, that:

since the particle must emerge with some energy.
The same is true for angular distributions, which are generally
written in terms of ,
the angle of deflection of the particle, as in
which is the angular deflection distribution for particles of energy E,
with units of .
As an illustration, you should be able to deduce that:
=
probability that particle emerges from the collision
with a deflection angle between
and 
and that:

Use of mass interaction and attenuation coefficients
One other convention that we will have to get used to is that the photon
interaction coefficients themselves are not usually tabulated (i.e., presented
in data tables or problem descriptions) as the
values we have discussed, but instead as this value divided by the material
density, ,
which has units of
and is referred to as the mass interaction (or attenuation) coefficients.
(i.e.,The word "linear" is replaced with the word "mass".)
This has been found to be useful for a number of reasons:
Where, as we have seen, the product of flux and linear interaction
coefficient, ,
gives us interaction rate per unit volume, the product of flux and
mass interaction coefficient, ,
gives us interaction rate per unit mass.
As we will see in Chapter 5, the concept of dose, in units of
rad, is a measure of energy deposition per unit mass, which fits this unit
better..
The energy dependence of
tends to be fairly uniform for many different materials. As
we will see, photon interactions tend to be driven by the presence of electrons.
Since materials with similar masses tend to have similar numbers of electrons,
this uniformity results.
Note: It is somewhat surprising (to me, at least) to compare
the data in Tables C.5 on pages 451 and 452. It shows that the mass
interaction coefficients for air and water are very similar. (The
principal difference is that water has a substantial hydrogen content.
Hydrogen delivers more electrons per unit mass than any other element.)
Since it is per unit mass, it applies just as well to elements as to
materials. The neutron community uses a microscopic cross
section for individual isotopes and builds macroscopic cross sections from
them using isotope densities:
where I = number of isotopes
=
number density of isotope i (nuclei/barn/cm)
=
microscopic total cross section of isotope i (barns)
No such juggling of units
is needed if we stay on a per mass basis, since:
where =mass
fraction of isotope i in the material
|